50 banner minimum?

This has impacted a few players that didn't set defence and didn't win banners despite attacking!

I would like the link to this update notification please so I can share @CG_SBCrumb_MINI @CG_Doja_Fett_MINI

Thanks in advance

Luckily there were threads like this so I could get the word out to my guild during this recent TB and help some members receive rewards. It would have been nice to have had a big notification (or two) in advance, but the word is out now and it is up to the officers of each guild to make sure the members know.

Simple fix: award players 25 Banners for each lost fight on offense that do not count for the guild's result.

awarding banners for lost fights is a great way to lose the war.

This is total BS. I won 3 battles in my TW and didn't get any rewards. How tf is that even close to fair? At least 2 of them were battles that guild mates already fought and lost quickly (nearly no damage done and basically just cost us banners and preloaded enemy tm). Because I cleaned them up I get punished with no rewards because I am not strong enough to do it 4 times? So am I just supposed to avoid any fights that were already attempted? Awesome job providing a reason for people to care more about themselves and their rewards instead of doing everything you can to help your guild win. Now I have been taught that there is a very real chance I will get zero rewards unless I pick and choose fights that benefit me more than they benefit the guild. I totally get making people participate, but how tf is winning 3 battles not participating? I will admit it is a super effective strategy for making sure less and less people ever consider joining a tw though.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2325590" wrote:
A good guild would ensure all signed up members set at least 2 defence squads.

and along those lines, a good guild leader & officers would also monitor TW and if somebody is short, send them a gentle reminder to get more points before its too late.

This requirement to need to hit an individual quota of banners in order to get the rewards for Territory War has come to my attention today after members of the guild I lead were complaining about it in our guild chat.

The lack of transparency of whenever this change to Territory Wars went into effect has me FURIOUS.

From the beginning of Territory Wars, our guild’s approach was to encourage people to join and “get the defenses filled” but not to micro-manage the details beyond different strategies we’d try with how to zone our defenses.

The rewards messages that I have received to this day state that ALL participants in the War would get the rewards. But, apparently for the last few months, if not longer, that has NOT been the case.

Apparently the game developers think that my officers and I don’t have lives outside this game… that we have time to be on throughout the setup period to monitor and direct all the defense placements to ensure each person who signed up for the War meets, but does not exceed their quota, so that all those who joined can set their minimum required defenses too.

Not that there are ANY controls that allow you to remove or move squads once they have been placed. The only recourse we have against any guild member who might overstep and set too many defenses, thus blocking others from being able to achieve their minimum quota, would be to kick them from the guild. But, how is that fair… to deal out punishment for not sticking to a quota/limit THAT NONE OF US KNEW EXISTED!! There are various places where messages could and should be used to indicate that expectation.

So, I came to the forum to express my displeasure, which I have now done. The change was unnecessary, not communicated appropriately (if ever / at all) in the game, and seriously impacts the experience of the already incredibly frustrating process of trying to run a successful Territory War.

I hope that I have conveyed the intensity of my feelings on this matter, despite the fact the I have resisted to urge to curse and swear. /end rant.

"Elizabel;c-2343437" wrote:
This requirement to need to hit an individual quota of banners in order to get the rewards for Territory War has come to my attention today after members of the guild I lead were complaining about it in our guild chat.

The lack of transparency of whenever this change to Territory Wars went into effect has me FURIOUS.

From the beginning of Territory Wars, our guild’s approach was to encourage people to join and “get the defenses filled” but not to micro-manage the details beyond different strategies we’d try with how to zone our defenses.

The rewards messages that I have received to this day state that ALL participants in the War would get the rewards. But, apparently for the last few months, if not longer, that has NOT been the case.

Apparently the game developers think that my officers and I don’t have lives outside this game… that we have time to be on throughout the setup period to monitor and direct all the defense placements to ensure each person who signed up for the War meets, but does not exceed their quota, so that all those who joined can set their minimum required defenses too.

Not that there are ANY controls that allow you to remove or move squads once they have been placed. The only recourse we have against any guild member who might overstep and set too many defenses, thus blocking others from being able to achieve their minimum quota, would be to kick them from the guild. But, how is that fair… to deal out punishment for not sticking to a quota/limit THAT NONE OF US KNEW EXISTED!! There are various places where messages could and should be used to indicate that expectation.

So, I came to the forum to express my displeasure, which I have now done. The change was unnecessary, not communicated appropriately (if ever / at all) in the game, and seriously impacts the experience of the already incredibly frustrating process of trying to run a successful Territory War.

I hope that I have conveyed the intensity of my feelings on this matter, despite the fact the I have resisted to urge to curse and swear. /end rant.

You realize this thread is over 3 months old... as a guild leader you should have been aware for some time now. If you had an issue 3 months ago, your rage may have been justified, but at this point it's on you.

"Elizabel;c-2343437" wrote:
There are various places where messages could and should be used to indicate that expectation.

Such as the rewards tab?

Oh, so I should keep cycling through every possible screen in the game constantly to see if the devs have changed something that they didn’t bother to announce IN GAME in any way?

Adding a little line of text in some sub-screen that I haven’t looked at in ages for a feature/event that has existed for a long time and then my lack of knowledge of that little bit of text should not be “on me”.

It’s on the developers who think nothing of user experience and logical use of the game interface. The expectation that everyone reads the forum all the time is also ridiculous.

Like I said in my post, I have a life and I don’t care whether the earlier poster feels the timing of my anger is justified or not. It is what it is.