Ackbar Broken after Bariss fix
Ackbar''s Leadership skill was not a Zeta, and it persisted after his death, now when he dies the "fire after non-attack move" buff goes with him, and that needs to be fixed asap!
Forum Discussion
"leef;857053" wrote:"Acrofales;857037" wrote:"leef;857034" wrote:"Acrofales;857032" wrote:"RebelBass;857015" wrote:
St Han taunting won't always trigger a Rebel attack, as St Han has a chance to reduce enemy TM. If this triggers, it counts as an "attack", and prevents Ackbar's Rebel Coordination. This isn't a bug, it's WAI.
STHan taunt does not have a chance to reduce enemy TM? What are you talking about? STHan's taunt gives all other allies 30% TM instantly. That is all (and if STHan is attacked, it gives all other allies 20% TM). STHan has no way of reducing enemy TM except through his unique, which triggers at the start of a turn, not when he uses an ability.
regardless, it could still count as an attack that turn, wich it apparantly does.
Then they need to reword Ackbar's special. It doesn't say "doesn't attack", it says "uses an ability that isn't an attack".
he uses his unique ability, wich counts as an attack. I'm not saying it's worded perfectly, but it could be interpreted in this manner.
I dissagree. The unique — even if it counts as an attack — should not prevent AA's leader ability to kick in and call a rebel to assist. AA's leader ability reads "...whenever an ally uses an ability, that isn't an attack..." it doesn't read: "...whenever an ally ends a turn without having used an ability, that is an attack...".
Hence, if both an attack ability and a non—attack ability is activated a rebel should be called to assist.
However, I don't believe uniques trigger a rebel assist at all under AA lead. It would have crazy consequenses, if f.ex. Biggs would call a rebel to assist, whenever he gains 100% TM from his unique (which is clearly not an attack). Just think about it. A quadrupple attack (rebel assist followed by Biggs' special).
