"DarthScott;848257" wrote:
"SnakesOnAPlane;848246" wrote:
"Nastynas91;848154" wrote:
I agree. It's very unfair. Should go by the first person to reach the score
Agreed! First person who posts the score is how it should work, and same for 0s.
I don't like speed as the tiebreaker because almost all guilds leave raids open for a long time to let people get on the leaderboard. So speed as the tiebreaker is weird
It's a better tie-breaker than player ID because at least it's player controlled and not computer controlled.
Other tie-breakers would probably be much harder to implement and honestly probably a bit obscure like the "least hits to obtain the damage" is weird and probably much harder to implement. Same with anything like "most hp/protection left at the end" they'd all be hard to code where as speed is easy because all of the battles are time stamped in pretty much every thing in game.
