Can we get a different tie breaker than player ID for raid?

@Maraxus nothing but truth there haha

"Grandepatron;848324" wrote:
Please fix the current system an make it like the Guild Activites Contribution Board! No one complains about that ranking system.

+1

When guild hopping, doing this or that with things, etc are the norm, it should be expected to have to deal with things when you advance in the game faster than intended.

"Maraxus;848347" wrote:

"KeyMan64x;848287" wrote:
Until EA can figure out how to program, you guys could take turns at the top...assuming you have good people. Do it something like this...

1. Solo
2. Solo -10% of P4
3. Solo -20% of P4
4. Solo -30% of P4
5. Solo -40% of P4

Once a player hits a mark they try to pull their characters out or just do silly things to die early.

Something like that should work and be fair. Rotate the top spots like many do in arena. Pretty simple.

All of that said, I think it should be the first person to the score. That's what EA said would happen in tournaments. But, I could also argue that for the people that solo Rancor, they should all get first place rewards. This would only apply for solos, not other places so people don't take advantage and post zeroes etc.

We do rancor every 2 days... And I full auto mode... It would be a pain to have someone loose time to coordinate all that "rotation" for a guild... Better have them fix the coding!

What squad are you using that you solo it on auto?

"danrussoa;848832" wrote:
When guild hopping, doing this or that with things, etc are the norm, it should be expected to have to deal with things when you advance in the game faster than intended.

Go back to your cave ;)

"Wildcats1203;848836" wrote:

"Maraxus;848347" wrote:

"KeyMan64x;848287" wrote:
Until EA can figure out how to program, you guys could take turns at the top...assuming you have good people. Do it something like this...

1. Solo
2. Solo -10% of P4
3. Solo -20% of P4
4. Solo -30% of P4
5. Solo -40% of P4

Once a player hits a mark they try to pull their characters out or just do silly things to die early.

Something like that should work and be fair. Rotate the top spots like many do in arena. Pretty simple.

All of that said, I think it should be the first person to the score. That's what EA said would happen in tournaments. But, I could also argue that for the people that solo Rancor, they should all get first place rewards. This would only apply for solos, not other places so people don't take advantage and post zeroes etc.

We do rancor every 2 days... And I full auto mode... It would be a pain to have someone loose time to coordinate all that "rotation" for a guild... Better have them fix the coding!

What squad are you using that you solo it on auto?

There are many of them (which is why so many people are doing it now)

Zader lead empire team
Wiggs with jyn chirrut (my favorite)
Teebo dengar (old school)

"Maraxus;848845" wrote:

"danrussoa;848832" wrote:
When guild hopping, doing this or that with things, etc are the norm, it should be expected to have to deal with things when you advance in the game faster than intended.

Go back to your cave ;)

Point was valid, despite your winky reply. When corporate guilds, like yours, push the envelope to completely max out everything as fast as possible, it is illogical to then complain about the game not progressing fast enough to compensate for this. I don't believe the devs planned on an entire guild maxxing a raid.

"danrussoa;848892" wrote:

"Maraxus;848845" wrote:

"danrussoa;848832" wrote:
When guild hopping, doing this or that with things, etc are the norm, it should be expected to have to deal with things when you advance in the game faster than intended.

Go back to your cave ;)

Point was valid, despite your winky reply. When corporate guilds, like yours, push the envelope to completely max out everything as fast as possible, it is illogical to then complain about the game not progressing fast enough to compensate for this. I don't believe the devs planned on an entire guild maxxing a raid.

I disagree. Jyn, Bistan, and zeta Vader are all recent additions to the game. All of them provide excellent tm reduction. CG had to have known the impact these chars would have on the ability to solo the rancor raid. You hardly have to push the envelope to solo rancor at this point, the power creep on the characters has made it pretty easy.

"DarthScott;848916" wrote:

"danrussoa;848892" wrote:

"Maraxus;848845" wrote:

"danrussoa;848832" wrote:
When guild hopping, doing this or that with things, etc are the norm, it should be expected to have to deal with things when you advance in the game faster than intended.

Go back to your cave ;)

Point was valid, despite your winky reply. When corporate guilds, like yours, push the envelope to completely max out everything as fast as possible, it is illogical to then complain about the game not progressing fast enough to compensate for this. I don't believe the devs planned on an entire guild maxxing a raid.

I disagree. Jyn, Bistan, and zeta Vader are all recent additions to the game. All of them provide excellent tm reduction. CG had to have known the impact these chars would have on the ability to solo the rancor raid. You hardly have to push the envelope to solo rancor at this point, the power creep on the characters has made it pretty easy.

In fairness, the original point of simply changing the ranking structure for ties is probably valid to some degree, if it is based on ABC order or something. I don't get that far into the details to know.

The fact remains the corporate guilds try to do everything possible to be first, evidenced by the plethora of world first posts since inception, and again, catching up to the devs and asking for changes seems illogical overall, given the lengths some will go to be first.

"Stalbot;848402" wrote:
Change your name to AAA and you will come out on top

Troll?