"ImYourHuckleberry;c-1087639" wrote:
"Jedi_Reach_;c-1087594" wrote:
"hilikus;c-1082959" wrote:
"Dark_Light;c-1081575" wrote:
Reading comprehension -1
"dough;c-1082610" wrote:
"hilikus;c-1081663" wrote:
"dough;c-1081606" wrote:
oh great, another "can be beaten easily" automaton who makes the claim yet doesn't back it up with anything factual... Zzzzzz
define "easily" and cite these "many other teams.
Is that reall up for debate? No one is denying that except you. Just look it up on YouTube or here on the forum. I personally beat them consistently with Wiggs + lando + Boba + St han. But unfortunately i didn't take the time because I actually thought nobody cares about that.
So definition of easy: 80% success rate. Happy now?
nah, why don't *you* look it up on YT or the forums, i'm not your personal assistant and i'm not the one making spurious claims about "easily beaten" and "multiple teams."
Quick YT seatch, there you go:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4nC2F-nXcw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOmNJ_BaU9Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ7IkubZiGg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZVN_ilC8nI
But I am sure they all dont count for some reason you will tell me soon.
Also before Zaul, Empire under Zader or EP with TFP and Shore was the meta.
"dough;c-1082610" wrote:
i just don't think you're getting anywhere near that (with STH no less) and if you were you wouldn't be foisting your claims off onto other players on YT or this forum.
What do you want me to do, guy? They are pretty easily beat with Boba and a fast ST Han. Ability Block on Baze, Taunt from Han, hammer on Baze and just chip him away with all those extra Turn Meter you are getting. Pretty solid strategy. By the time he is dead, Chirrut has a huge amount of buffs -> Execute from Boba and it is pretty much over. I did not make a recording of it so believe it or not. I can tell you though: I switched out ST Hand and Chaze in not because of other Chaze, but because that game breaking Zaul Abomination. Good luck facing him without Chaze.
"Dark_Light;c-1081575" wrote:
nobody's denying this except me? you've got 7 pages of posts that largely fly in the face of your assertions...
Read the first Post, man. The debate here is, it is not about if they are beatable or not but how they bring too much stuff to the table as a duo. And here I disagree. It should be all about if they are beatable without chaze and some teams or not that defines if they are game breaking or not. I know they are extremely strong and probably should never made that strong. But I say game Breaking is another level still.
You are indeed the only one who claims they are unbeatable without Chaze.
Hey, person who refuses to read all the other points addressed in this thread.
Beatable does not equal balance.
Hey person who doesn't pay attention to logic. Beatable means all your balance brownie points are really moot.
I guess that means the 96 Chicago bulls weren't as good as they were because they had the players they did and lost 10 games in the normal season
