Circle of logic
I wanna start by saying this post is a question. I’m actively looking for someone to piece this together for me in a respectful way if I’m missing something obvious. I don’t write code and I’m not fam...
Forum Discussion
"Kyno;c-2098052" wrote:"Iy4oy4s;c-2098045" wrote:"Kyno;c-2097911" wrote:"Iy4oy4s;c-2097728" wrote:
When someone holds all the data and won’t share said data, they can say whatever they want about that data. This coupled with the CGDF, the community loses every time.
calling them names, and saying they dont care is a winning strategy for the community?
I wasnt calling anyone names in the negative sense. Based on my data, CG is wrong on the sandbox issue.
yes, i acknowledged that. I didn't mean to imply you were.
I agree they should not close the door on this, even if its not slated for "the now".
that said, i can understand the choice and how they got to it from the data they can collect from the current state of the game.
But how can they collect data on whether or not a sandbox mode would be used if there is no sandbox mode? You cant compare any event so far to what a sandbox mode would be or what the community wants it to be. GW is a joke and is worthless for testing anything. None of the LS/DS nodes have any enemies with relics. Ahnald is having to use the arena with help of his shard mates to get a "sandbox mode" at the cost of crystals to test team comps. So the whole, "we looked at the data" argument falls really flat.
It just comes down to it not being "free" for them to create as they said. They should have just left it there instead of trying to justify their choice because of "data" Remember their data showed them that we LOVE relics because of the high engagement with them.
