Conquest 10

"StewartH;c-2308790" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2308768" wrote:

"StewartH;c-2308765" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2308762" wrote:

"Ravens1113;c-2308757" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2308746" wrote:

"PB940;c-2308737" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2308736" wrote:

"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308729" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2308618" wrote:

"Edgar_the_Bug;c-2308562" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2308489" wrote:

"khdelboy;c-2308481" wrote:
I’m more interested if they will revise the changes to the conquest especially the energy needed for one battle, lt that I have any much hope they will do so.

Also the new conquest toon. Not interested in Maul (it will be a long time before I go for LV and I wouldn’t bother with a mando faction for a while.)

There are changes coming, but I wouldn't expect to see things like that change, it will likely be around the feats and some organization things there. But we will have to wait and see what actually makes it into the next set.

So basically they aren’t going to listen to the feedback and just serve up more hot garbage?

Or we can wait to see what changed before jumping to conclusions.

Imagine CG actually had a way to communicate with us.

Imagine waiting for the information they do communicate....

I know its rought they dont meet imaginary timelines, but again I understand it's hard to wait.

Well now at this point it’s just annoying with so many leaks. Like why wait anymore? Release the RA and let us digest the info

The app store is a leak?

CG is a primary source.
Accurate and pertinent information is coming from secondary sources.
No matter what the timeline or the spin, that's not a good look.

They dont control when that information gets updated by google, they have to provide it early, as it has to be vetted by them.

Not sure how this looks bad, in any way.

And thank you for agreeing this is no a leak. It's an intentional place where information is provided about the app, and the update.

Sorry to keep coming but what your suggesting proves my point -
CG provided the info to Google/Apple.
Unless CG willfully provided info to Google/Apple thats wrong the info they provided will not change.
Google/Apple tells the consumer what is happening via update notes.
CG (presumably) tells the consumer what is happening after that.

What possible harm would come from telling us what they told Google? Thats the problem.

No harm, and they did, but they are not going to randomly change the plan of release of the RA, just because Google pushed the app through the update process.

It's not like the information wasnt coming out, and it's supposed to be there, so it's not a leak, and literally changes nothing that we found out a few hours before the RA was released some bullet points of information from Google.