Ezra and kannan..They're both rebels and Jedi, right?
They're both rebels and Jedi, right? That means we get the first characters usable to get both EP and Yoda.
Forum Discussion
"Mullato;955867" wrote:"Setish;955849" wrote:"ZephimyrAC;955235" wrote:"Gank_Killer;955223" wrote:"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:"DatBoi;953062" wrote:"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
LOL it makes perfect sense, your're wrong.
no.. you are. asajj killed herself in a selfless act to save her true love. she ends up being revered by the jedi.
Vader killed himself in a selfless act to save his child, who revered him (and was a Jedi), so why is he Sith?
Um, maybe because by the time he did that (the very end of the movie) he wasn't a sith anymore since he was redeemed.
Where were you when Anakin's force ghost popped up alongside Yoda and old Ben....?
I'm just trying to show the flaw in logic of the other person.
