Fair for all guilds

"DuneFlint;c-2077170" wrote:

"Kisermiester;c-2077155" wrote:
The game needs to be fair. And that means to individuals as well. You seem to think that if you have more people you should have more access. That's wrong!! I don't care if they did away with the tickets all together and had a time limit between the finish and start of a particular raid. Then the larger guilds will get through it faster and be starting the next one sooner. You still have the advantage. Your way of thinking has driven off many players. We see this way is not working for many. Something needs to change in a fair way. And not in a way that one feels more entitled to access just because they have a larger group. That doesn't make any sense.

In your proposed change You seem to think that the advantage for a larger guild is that they can complete the raid faster. Heroic rancor is a full on sim, or 5min auto no matter how many members in the guild. Haat is a 15min full auto, even if you only have 25people in the guild. So how exactly is a larger guild completing a raid faster to start a new one sooner? The game was designed and balanced with 50 people guilds in mind. Either be in a guild with 50, or suffer the consequences. You don't think it takes alot of work for officers to recruit/manage 50 people??

I know it takes a lot of work. And the game forces 50 member guilds too much. I'm only asking for the access to raids. Not the completion. You seem to think that all guilds who have access will be able to finish these raids as fast as your guild does. That is the mistake here. And if a smaller guild does have the roster to do so, then they've earned that right. I don't understand why you would think any differently. There is plenty of other things smaller guilds are locked from. Raids don't need to be one of them.