"niko4;c-2256494" wrote:
@Waqui How is the data irrelevant? The goal is to not only show CG there is a problem but also you and others that think they are in a comparable veteran shard that mine is still an outlier. Mine is obviously not comparable to yours when looking at that data. I'm sorry that you refuse to grasp that.
Your shard is not an outlier since it compares to some (not all - but some) other shards. Somehow you refuse to accept this.
"niko4;c-2256494" wrote:
Would you prefer a different way to compare?
Check my previous posts. You appear to have missed some.
"niko4;c-2256494" wrote:
If not, I'd simply save your breath and move on to another thread.
And how would you recommend re-organizing the shard? Have the 100+ super active people all in the main group? It makes it too busy and then you get into a similar problem as @Kyno who said they have 65 people...
How you organise is up to you. However, I'm sure that having two competing shard chats generates additional battles/activity.
"niko4;c-2256494" wrote:
No, the real issue is the active population in our group is still far larger than normal shards.
And I haven't missed any of Kyno's comments.
Yet, you keep claiming that your shard's composition makes it an outlier.
