GA is a forgone conclusion

"Holy_warrior;c-1777780" wrote:

Where have I moaned about losing in this thread?

I’m simply pointing out that under the current matchmaking process GA matches are predictable because similar GP can produce wildly different rosters.

You can hold an opposing view without being rude.

You’ve lost me. This thread was about cussing your opponent(s) because their rosters are 10x better than yours. You’re suggesting you want to win by fighting opponents who have less stature than you? I’d be happy to have a 1v1 but we can’t do that because the match making is fair and wont let me touch players with lower or higher gp. Why would they? Lets go back to football? ( not great at football) but lets say you’re manchester city in a high tier league and randomly you’re selected to face some one who’s in a underdog league, is that fair? No. However if that underdog team has the same statute as you then would it? Yes. At the same time they wouldn’t be an underdog, they’d also be in the premier league fighting for the trophy also. Get it out the system that the matchmaking is flawed because its really not, its totally random and it’s a global selection. And its alll down to gp and thus if a player dedicated him self to one team rather than 10 random heroes that don’t syng together thats down to the person.

If you don’t like the ga don’t join it? You join it if you want to participate and earn them cushty rewards.. which i think are terrible but getting better by the Month. I agree with you on one thing though. The playeds who don’t set sqauds should be punished and struck out some how because that really isnt fair and i really do feel for everyone affected by that game play.

So don’t feel like i’m being obnoxious.
A post has been made like this over and over again.. same result every time. You’ll be disapointed.
Winners will win, and losers will carry on crying because the match making is flawed..



For the last time, neither of the original rosters are mine.

My roster is strong for my GP and I do well enough in GA.

My point, is simply this. Steamrolling an opponent or being steamrolled isn’t fun IMO.

A game should be about fun. Therefore I would prefer match-ups to be closer than they are now.

Punishing players who don’t set a defence is not what I would advocate. Rather, it would be better to ask. “Why are so many players not setting a defence?” And then adapt the game to address this cause.

I suspect many don’t set defences because they don’t stand a chance of winning so don’t bother. Therefore a change should be made to make matches more competitive. Altering the matchmaking is one way to achieve this.