"Jeebbers;c-2167466" wrote:
"TVF;c-2167465" wrote:
"Jeebbers;c-2167463" wrote:
"DarjeloSalas;c-2167305" wrote:
If someone with no GL is being matched against someone with 2, you have to question the roster development somewhat.
I don't even know what you mean by that. If you were in a bad position for GL and are FTP, it might take you months, maybe even longer, before you can unlock them. I hated the sequels, and saw no reason to get FO or Resistance geared. So my who gameplay experience should be ruined? I don't really see the argument.
If you are making roster choices based on disliking certain movies, GAC is not for you.
Dude, this game is for fun. Before GL, it didn't matter having FO or Resistance, so who cared? They were some of the weakest tags in the game. So, it wouldn't even matter if i liked them or not. Before GL, the data reports showed those two factions had the some the lowest amounts of G13's. But, nah, you're right. Just relic every character, yeah? Who cares if they're worthless.
This is how it’s always been though--there's a certain meta, usually based around a new character, and that meta doesn't care what you do or don't like. I'm one of the few who thought KOTOR was overrated and had no particular love of the characters, and I wasn't exactly thrilled when I felt I had to max out all these toons because CG told me to. There were other things I would rather have worked on. Sometimes having more fun might mean winning less, and that's something you have to sort out.
I don't disagree that the power creep, shifting goal posts, and unlock requirements have gotten much worse as longtime players have accumulated more resources. But the issue of gearing up toons you didn't like to get the new OP toon started long before the GLs. And it will continue...how much are you betting that the third set of GL Luke requirements will see a relic Farmboy?
