Grand Arena matchmaking.
I'll start by saying that I love Grand Arena as a feature and hope you guys keep running it on a frequent basis. Two a month would probably be ideal, but I'm sure that's going to be tough to balance a...
Forum Discussion
"jayjonbeach;c-1787717" wrote:
Then you seem to assume that in an even match-up, someone is going to be much weaker, this is where you go off the rails.
"Waqui;c-1787710" wrote:
Please explain what makes you believe this?
LOL you want me to quote what is just above you in the thread really? Now you just look like a troll, you basically said it all over again in your new message.
"Waqui;c-1787710" wrote:
Even match-ups will give players, who developed a weaker roster, an easier path to winning high rank rewards in GA and give players, who developed a strong roster (same GP as the weaker ones), a harder path to winning the same high rank rewards. I don't see this as fair. A believe, that mixing stronger and weaker rosters (even GP) in the groups of 8 is far more fair.
"Waqui;c-1787710" wrote:
My point is: When considering 16 players with even GP, if the 8 eight players with weaker rosters are grouped together, while the 8 players with stronger rosters are grouped together, the players with weaker rosters would have a higher chance of winning
You keep going on about "weaker rosters" in a scenario designed to make sure there are none.
ONLY in the CURRENT system are there "weaker" rosters to consider, which is why it is NOT a fair system.
What you seem to want, is exactly that, you want uneven match-ups so stronger rosters, can walk over weaker ones, so they DON"T have a chance, you don't want the weaker rosters to have more of a chance. And you think that is more fair than what the OP and I are suggesting?
Ok, I really have no more time for that line of thinking
