It's time to balance Baze/Chirrut

"StarSon;c-1059018" wrote:

"JediGhost117;c-1059000" wrote:

"StarSon;c-1058995" wrote:

"Waez;c-1058975" wrote:
If you think nerfs are bad in a game, take a look at, I don't know, every single competitive game out there.

Just because other games do it, doesn't mean it's the best solution.

If it works, then it does. Look at Paragon. Aurora was flat out OP and they needed her damage and people stopped complaining. It's funny how when you do what the fans want they stop having reasons to complain about the game.

Never played that game, so can't say. But also, just because people complain doesn't mean it's a real issue. The forums (i.e. where people come to complain) is a very small percentage of the game's population in this game. Can't speak to other games, but I assume it's similar. The devs will have enough data to know whether something needs to be nerfed or not.

What kind of backwards logic is this? Using it, we should determine who our president should be based on going door to door instead of just counting the ballots because the people that actually voted only make up a small perecentage of our population. Unless you actually voice your opinions then they don't matter. The people that aren't on the forums don't get a say in what is OP or not because they chose not voice their opinions. So in that regard, yes the forum should be where the devs get most of their information about what the playerbase likes and dislikes about certain toons. In fact that's the only fair way for them to do it and make changes to toons.