JKL event eta?

Considering the last run was only last month I doubt he'll be back before end of November/into December.

He just came back a second time

"Jpfit262;c-2173667" wrote:
I get that, but with him being required for GL that kind of changes things I would think?

Don't think to much, could hurt yourself. ;)

"scuba;c-2173673" wrote:

"Jpfit262;c-2173667" wrote:
I get that, but with him being required for GL that kind of changes things I would think?

Don't think to much, could hurt yourself. ;)

Oddly enough I have a headache now

"Jpfit262;d-236341" wrote:
When will he be back? Since the eta of GL is Oct 7 I would imagine he has to come back around then?

I wouldnt bet on him following anything other than the "normal cadence" for any event of that caliber.

I think this has to be the shortest turn around for a "when does x come back" thread yet.

"crzydroid;c-2173852" wrote:
I think this has to be the shortest turn around for a "when does x come back" thread yet.

It's like when my kids start telling me what they want next Christmas....on New Year's Eve

"RandomSithLord;c-2173906" wrote:

"Jpfit262;c-2173667" wrote:
I get that, but with him being required for GL that kind of changes things I would think?

Why would it? GLs are permanently available events so there is no reason to tie the required legendary/journey character's cadence to their release date.

I mean, JKL's not going to return early, but I would hardly say that JML is "permanently available" if one of his direct requirements is not permanently available. This was a bit of underhanded play on CG's part, but also not surprising.

"chionophile;c-2173975" wrote:

"RandomSithLord;c-2173906" wrote:

"Jpfit262;c-2173667" wrote:
I get that, but with him being required for GL that kind of changes things I would think?

Why would it? GLs are permanently available events so there is no reason to tie the required legendary/journey character's cadence to their release date.

I mean, JKL's not going to return early, but I would hardly say that JML is "permanently available" if one of his direct requirements is not permanently available. This was a bit of underhanded play on CG's part, but also not surprising.

I'm so confused, underhanded? Really?

Did you feel that way for R2 > CLS, or BB8 > JTR, or both Revans > Malak, orother times one toon has been required for another and it was not permanently available.

This has been the way of many event and is nothing new, and certainly not underhanded.

Kyno the difference between the events you list and the GL is that they specifically made a point of GLs being available from day one where you can farm in your own pace. That was not the case with the events before. So there’s a difference. It’s all in how they communicate things, which to be fair has never been their strong side.