Limit TW Sandbagging
Why not make TW matchups according to TOTAL guild gp? This would reward guilds who get maximum participation from their members. Instead, these active gp matchups encourage guilds to limit participati...
Forum Discussion
"Finch1221;c-1936842" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-1936839" wrote:
So if I’m on vacation or at a wedding or attending a family funeral and can’t participate in TW, the rest of my guild suffer?
Sounds fair!
The flaw is with the matchmaking, not either guild. A guild who allows members to not take part should not be punished, just the same as a guild who gets everyone to take part shouldn’t be punished.
The problem is guilds actively encouraging people not to join to get an easier match up, not allowing people not to take part and yea if you cannot join it is fair that your guild should suffer in what way is it not fair? Whats not fair is guilds who get everyone to participate just to be matched against a guild way ahead of where they are.
Yes you can blame the matchmaking but it would be very hard to match simliar GP as well as similar members joined it would be much easier to work off of total GP and would stop these horrible mismatches.
Finally don't forget the less people who have joined the less you can put in defense so there is already measures in place for guilds when someone cannot join which at the moment further encourages guilds to make members not participate because then these lesser guilds don't have any advantage through strength or numbers.
Problem with what you're saying is then guilds can just manipulate their rosters. They can even kick guild members who agree to it and just inv them back after the TW. I get what you';re saying but there's already a 25 player minimum in place for the TW. It's like GA. People suggest "fixes" yet someone will always find a way to manipulate it to their advantage.
