"BentWookiee;c-1267815" wrote:
"Liath;c-1267813" wrote:
"BentWookiee;c-1267810" wrote:
Come on people.. you complain if people do not respond and then complain if they do. If you read @CG_RyDiggs as condescending that is on you, communication in written form conveys no "emotions" the reader applies that themselves. :|
Maybe you should pay attention to the message without your rage goggles on? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6e39/c6e39e5ee3302e0a4c275c11caebcb7d11754e84" alt=""
Do you really, honestly believe that it isn't possible to be condescending in writing? Because that is utter absurdity.
Tell me what my emotion was when I wrote this.
Condescending. Mocking. Ill informed. (or at least, not much of a reader if you don't think emotion and attitude can be conveyed through the written word. Read books much? - see, you got what my emotion was there didn't you? It likely annoyed you and earned me a warning from the current mod squad)
This is the problem, and largely why I suspect you're not a mod any longer... Condescention isn't the issue here. It's the evasion of our gripe regarding platoon duplication. We understood Ry to be talking about the last TB (living game, can't make changes at this time yadda yadda yadda) not THE ENTIRE HOTH TB. We were hoping for changes between the first and this TB. And clearly, they have made changes. The difficulty (as I expected honestly) has been dialed up and they've done something weird to the platoons.
I'm not complaining about the response, my complaint is in the CONTENT of the non-response. Several of us have been calling for an answer to this almost daily. To get the written equivalent of a shrug is what I personally find disappointing.