Please renew the Arena system
I think it would be necessary to renew the arena system for two fundamental reasons: -A day that you cannot fight for work or social life is a day lost and that affects your plans for your account. ...
Forum Discussion
One should always be open blank slating old systems when it could be that they have served their purpose
Arena is the logical gaming glue that holds a shard of players together, and shards don't just out-compete, they age from player resignation. How much the consequences of long-term aging were considered when the original design was is unknown, but we have surely learned more of the consequences now that we are swimming in them.
I understand people saying don't touch current arena, but at the same time you are implicitly saying either:
- CG did everything right to begin with and their intentions have been fulfilled
- CG made a game mode with shortcomings but we should not try to change
- CG outperformed their original intentions and you don't fix something that is outperforming.
I'd rather go with CG made a game mode with shortcomings and they should try and change. What changes? I'd leave that up to the current plethora of feedback they have and their own decision process. As it stands this is a great game. Massive shortcomings considering its potential.
I just think we need constant parallel but staggered Grand Arenas. Everytime you log in you should be able to have full Grand Arena battles at your will. That's what I would like to see.
Arena is the logical gaming glue that holds a shard of players together, and shards don't just out-compete, they age from player resignation. How much the consequences of long-term aging were considered when the original design was is unknown, but we have surely learned more of the consequences now that we are swimming in them.
I understand people saying don't touch current arena, but at the same time you are implicitly saying either:
- CG did everything right to begin with and their intentions have been fulfilled
- CG made a game mode with shortcomings but we should not try to change
- CG outperformed their original intentions and you don't fix something that is outperforming.
I'd rather go with CG made a game mode with shortcomings and they should try and change. What changes? I'd leave that up to the current plethora of feedback they have and their own decision process. As it stands this is a great game. Massive shortcomings considering its potential.
I just think we need constant parallel but staggered Grand Arenas. Everytime you log in you should be able to have full Grand Arena battles at your will. That's what I would like to see.
