Raid Sim: What the Devs say
Most recent Dev quote regarding raid sim in recent Q&A 2) The AAT sim has been discussed pretty recently. I would say that one has a good chance of seeing a roll out sooner rather than later (no p...
Forum Discussion
"AnnerDoon;c-2029116" wrote:"leef;c-2029097" wrote:"AnnerDoon;c-2029030" wrote:"leef;c-2029002" wrote:
the majority of my guild (including me) can't auto solo the entire raid.
Is it "can't", or "can't be bothered to"? Have you tried and failed, or failed to try? Because at your GP, I'd think you could do it.
From what i've read my current g13/relic levels don't allow for a solo on auto. Haven't really tried because i don't have relics to spare at the moment.
I'm sure i could do if i invested a bit more into that raid, but it's not worth it for me personally at this point in time.
That’s fair. But it sounds like your “can’t” is really “can’t be bothered to”. And that’s ok. The rewards don’t really justify the resources needed to build an auto-solo squad specifically for the hAAT.
But, your decision (and other’s) to ignore the hAAT because the rewards aren’t great (the result of which is that auto-solos aren’t super duper common) doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be simmable.
You're now ignoring the fact that it's not easy to auto solo the hAAT, which is also partly the reason why people like myself don't bother. At the time the rancor became sim-able most people in my position (veteran player) didn't need to craft a team specifically to auto solo the rancor, which made the whole raid redundant for a sizable portion of the playerbase. The hAAT hasn't reached that point yet, so they don't have to make the hAAT sim-able for that reason.
I do however agree that players like myself not bothering to even craft a hAAT solo team isn't a reason in it self to not make the raid sim-able. Heck, it can even be an argument for making the raid sim-able.
