"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428576" wrote:
"BubbaFett;c-2428571" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428557" wrote:
"BubbaFett;c-2428544" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428524" wrote:
I'd argue CG implementing 3v3 took away from those of us that liked it when it was all 5v5. CG could always run them concurrently and let us all sign up for the one we prefer.
This doesn't work when the entire premise of GAC is to pit the entire player base against itself and reward based on ranking....
Then CG could just remove 3v3 from the game... or redefine their premise.
Or just keep things as they are.....
Or don't becuase many people don't like 3v3. I've heard two arguments here against letting players choose. One is that 3v3 would be underpopulated because people don't like it as much (not much of an argument for forcing people to play it). The other is that it goes against some premise that is hardly set in stone.
Or third option: Because many DO actually like it. Read the comments... way more commenting they like than dislike. I personally Love 3v3 more. It's a game mode. Not all people will like all game modes. Cool thing is you don't have to play or participate in all the modes. I don't participate in TW. See choices. Good for the longevity of the game and not burning out the player base.