"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428782" wrote:
"Starslayer;c-2428737" wrote:
"Lumiya;c-2428581" wrote:
"StarSon;c-2428577" wrote:
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428526" wrote:
Why do we care if one side gets way more engagement?
Because it then erodes both sides. You don't like 3v3? Well, good news, it's already optional. Just don't play it.
I wouldn't agree that it is optional because it is a source (for some even the main source) for crystals.
Not really a problem in the current system where players (except at the top of k1) tend to 50% win rate by design.
"Ragnarok_COTF;c-2428664" wrote:
The ones that are happy to choose the mode they prefer. Presumably, most would be happy playing their preferred mode all the time.
Gac test player skill in fleet, 3v3 and 5v5. If i’m better/worse in any aspect it will affect my general performance. Choosing only one to compete in is a possibility, but it will make me unhappy (big word, let’s say very, very slightly upset) as i enjoy the current game mode. I’ll risk an analogy: gac is triathlon; if someone doesn’t like swimming, they could propose to choose between swimming and running to go with cycling, but it’s a different sport then.
I hate analogies, but... these choices already exist. Some runners specialize in a single event, some try multiple, some don't focus on track because they can make more money playing a different sport, etc.
Right now, you have everyone forced into the triathlon. Folks that despise 3v3 take losses they could otherwise win because they can't be bothered. So you already don't have the competitive integrity you seem to desire.
Yep, I took the risky road with the analogy. But I agree with how you interpret it: everybody is forced into the triathlon and I like it that way.
Now I won't argue that some players won't like that, just like some players don't like fleet and have to play it anyway if they want the daily crystal reward.