Is there any justification for CG to continue keeping the taunt on Slave I? The ship is an attacker and squishy. No taunt would also likely make a nice diff with Exec with some of the counters that have cropped up. As of right now, folks are resorting to removing him from Exec lineup to defend against what should be weak counters.I do get CG doesn’t necessarily follow Star Wars lore to a T, but Slave I never really taunted anyone. He preferred to lie low and hidden, and ultimately surprise his bounties with sneak attacks.

Technically he taunted those TIEs in the last episode of Mandalorian.

For the purpose of this game, a taunt gives you no other opportunities but to target the taunter (unless abilities give you taunt ignore). Choosing to follow someone doesn’t justify as being taunted. Plus, it was a one on one fight; that’s not a taunt. :p

Since when does this game go off only canon?

How has having a taunt for slave 1 anything to do with not being star wars lore?Lets be honest, you just want less counters.

"Gamorrean;c-2288727" wrote:How has having a taunt for slave 1 anything to do with not being star wars lore?Lets be honest, you just want less counters. Let’s be honest, you still mad at CG for saying they gonna make less counters.Remember when you claimed you were coming after the whales? 4 years later and how’s that working out for you? :D

Slave I: Taunt is Silly | EA Forums

crzydroid
Retired Hero
4 years ago
Technically he taunted those TIEs in the last episode of Mandalorian.
SnakesssOnAPlan
4 years ago
For the purpose of this game, a taunt gives you no other opportunities but to target the taunter (unless abilities give you taunt ignore). Choosing to follow someone doesn’t justify as being taunted. Plus, it was a one on one fight; that’s not a taunt. :p
LordDirt
New Traveler
4 years ago
Since when does this game go off only canon?
JStenholt97
4 years ago
How has having a taunt for slave 1 anything to do with not being star wars lore?

Lets be honest, you just want less counters.
SnakesssOnAPlan
4 years ago
"Gamorrean;c-2288727" wrote:
How has having a taunt for slave 1 anything to do with not being star wars lore?

Lets be honest, you just want less counters.

Let’s be honest, you still mad at CG for saying they gonna make less counters.

Remember when you claimed you were coming after the whales? 4 years later and how’s that working out for you? :D
NotRealUltra
Seasoned Newcomer
4 years ago
I don’t like Slave 1 taunting when called as RI

I don’t like Slave 1 and other attackers / support taunting when Executor does his heal special

Because they are immediately destroyed before they get another turn or two
LQRDQFMQRDQR
4 years ago
Executor's special abilities are also very weak and bland in theme.
Why did Breach of Protocols have to be a weak copy of Negotiator's mass attack? Not to mention how is this thematic in any way?
Same story for the 2nd special, "We only need to...". Cannot understand why taunt is given to target and not to Tanks. So that the AI can misplay the ability and we cannot use it on whichever ship is in need (because Taunt)?
Lastly, where are the asteroids? Anyone seen them? Bounty Hunters and asteroids would have made a wonderful combination.

I would like a rework of the ship.
Rath_Tarr0
4 years ago
"Salatious_Scrum;c-2288713" wrote:
Sure taunted Obi Wan to follow him into the Geonosis Asteroid Field

That was Jango not Boba.
SnakesssOnAPlan
4 years ago
"Rath_Tarr;c-2288741" wrote:
"Salatious_Scrum;c-2288713" wrote:
Sure taunted Obi Wan to follow him into the Geonosis Asteroid Field

That was Jango not Boba.

HAHAHA! Busted! :D

P.s. Technically, it was both Jango and Boba.
tvsfrink
4 years ago
"Ultra;c-2288731" wrote:

I don’t like Slave 1 and other attackers / support taunting when Executor does his heal special.

Just stay at 5* on Exec. Bonus, it's better than 7*!