Why equal TB rewards is bad for the game.
Top spenders in lower-medium tier HAAT guilds will be incentivized to leave their guilds. This will result in loss of comradery and loss of sense of community, which will result in ....(fill in the bl...
Forum Discussion
"sneeekypants;c-1233379" wrote:"Mr_Sausage;c-1233365" wrote:
Wasn't there a mass exodus of players looking to
join HAAT guilds? If whales didn't leave marginal strength guilds because of loyalty back then why would they leave now? We already have super guilds that merged when HAAT came out so top end guilds should already be solidified.
I just don't see people abandoning guilds now like they did when HAAT came out.
Actually most large guild alliances are merging their top players into "super guilds". Many are already completed, we're still in the process.
The reward structure is much different than HAAT and other games that have a guild event where everyone gets the same rewards. The key point is whales can't carry weak people, which was one of their main purposes.
You can have 1 whale and 49 new FTP players w 7* Lumi get HAAT rewards. The whale's rewards do not change and actually are better with a bunch of weak people since they will place higher vs a whale in a guild with 49 other whales.
he's talking about when the AAT was first introduced, so you're basically saying the same thing. It happened with the rancor aswell.
Under TB, for every weak or member less than 50, you lose out. That is the key. So you can look at it as instead of a whale providing for all, it's every weak player is deleting his potential reward. A whale with a bunch minnows is going to fall significantly behind whales that swim with other whales and won't be able to catch up no matter how much they spend.
That is assuming that a p2p guild that doesn't consist out of 100% whales won't be getting maximum rewards. There are only 2 things you can't buy in this game, raid han and general kenobi, so i find it highly unlikely that the whale in the minnow guild won't catch up.
