"Dryff;c-1462548" wrote:"leef;c-1462530" wrote:"Sacull_Kinslayer;c-1462471" wrote:
Yep. They did. DN or Thrawn for the most part. Thrawn is one of the few DS toons with utility. But Ls is full of toons with utility or synergy. DS had a few strong toons that occasionally LS squads would plug in. DS has nothing that compares to GK, r2, etc, etc, and all the LS toons that have huge utility. Thankfully, maybe, hopefully, the overlords have seen their error and will be continuing on correcting it to once again bring balance to the universe.
LS has nothing that compares to Thrawn, DN or NS for that matter either. Point being that if you want the best possible toons in your line-up you're gonna have to mix and match DS/LS.
I mean, I have to agree with @Sacull_Kinslayer here...if you just look at CLS, JTR, GK, R2, and Raid Han, you could flat out remove 2-3 things from their kits and they'd still be top tier characters. You remove any one piece from Thrawn or DN and I'm not sure you can say the same thing. :)
On topic, I currently use Palp (L), DN, Thrawn, GK, and SiT and let me tell you...wow. Before the Palp rework, I sat around 150 and would drop 50~70 spots per day on defense . Currently sitting at 51 now, and literally didn't drop a single spot overnight so this team must be doing something right on defense! Only been running this for about a day and a half, so we'll see what happens.
My SiT is 100% maxed, and between a Tenacity cross, one tenacity set, some secondaries and Palp's lead, CLS has a LOT of trouble landing buff immunity. That, and with Thrawn and GK on the team, there's no problem keeping the taunts up. I'm honestly curious if this team would be better or worse if I replaced SiT or GK with Vader. @leef @Sacull_Kinslayer
