Clones vs. Padmé

"thecarterologist958;c-2036884" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036883" wrote:

You've been wrong like 6 times in row... You actually don't want to use Anakin vs. JKR. Clone Sarge or Zarriss will do job much better. CS with excellent tm & damage off his basic, and Zarriss to essentially ensure Rex is around to AA opposition. Now grab a chocolate milk!!

Don't you have a thread complaining that Barriss isn't useful enough?

Indeed I do.

"jhbuchholz;c-2036887" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036886" wrote:

"thecarterologist958;c-2036881" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:


In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.

After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.

In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.

It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.

TL/DR

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:


They're an excellent tier 2 team

Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win.

You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible.

Then the point of this thread is that you'd like to... lose less decisively? ?

GET THE MAN A BEER!!! ??? YESSSS!!! ? And if I may sir (channeling my Oliver Twist), "Please sir, I'd like a less decisive loss that means I actually damaged you a tiny, tiny, eency weency, tiny bit, in hopes a 2nd or 3rd battle may prove fruitful!"

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036886" wrote:


You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible.

Lawyers are sworn to tell the truth, that would imply I am doing just that, just as you have implied you would like them to win from your comparisons to how well they do against other meta teams. Yes, just as some casualties are possible against Padme by apparently everyone in this thread who has geared clones bar you. Also you do damage them a little, but if you aren't even planning to take her out, then insisting on using your best team makes even less sense, use a worse team that is better designed for it...

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036891" wrote:

"jhbuchholz;c-2036887" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036886" wrote:

"thecarterologist958;c-2036881" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:


In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.

After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.

In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.

It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.

TL/DR

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:


They're an excellent tier 2 team

Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win.

You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible.

Then the point of this thread is that you'd like to... lose less decisively? ?

GET THE MAN A BEER!!! ??? YESSSS!!! ? And if I may sir (channeling my Oliver Twist), "Please sir, I'd like a less decisive loss that means I actually damaged you a tiny, tiny, eency weency, tiny bit, in hopes a 2nd or 3rd battle may prove fruitful!"

To be fair, this is a pretty preposterous point to make in a post. Especially in the context of a hard counter like this. You could use one of a dozen other teams to lose less decisively with.

"MasterJediBrian;c-2036805" wrote:

"Baby_Yoda;c-2036525" wrote:
@Kyno

It's just getting sad at this point.

Probably better off closing the thread.

Hey BabyYoda, we're still disseminating some info here-- if you wanna be the negative guy, do it somewhere else.

Look, literally everyone here is disagreeing with you either on the foundational premise in your original post or with factual evidence of their team beating Padme. This means that either you are a misunderstood genius with an intellect so massive that none of us can comprehend what you see--or you're a narcissist who just refuses to admit that they're wrong.

Which do you think is more likely?

Holy cow.

Complains that Clones can’t beat Padmé, is using a team that is only 60% clones ?

Have you tried a Rex lead instead of Shak Ti?

There are some videos from the YouTubers in which a few of them believe Rex is the superior offensive leader, especially against GG and Padmé.

Do you have ARC? I’d very much suggest trying about a dozen battles with Rex in the leader slot and 100% clones, and report back. You might not win, but you might get that “respectable loss” you’re looking for

Guys stop wasting your time .I have posted me wining with the team he said you can't with .
Now I will have to do it with Cody , sarge and Barris just t shut him up.

Arc is not the reason I win . It's the fact that I am smarter than the AI ,rex won a 4 Vs 1 with a turret holding him back by giving protection up due to the assists .I can clearly see ,by the way the goal post keep getting moved you are probably not smarter than the games dumb AI and this post will continue to grow untill you accomplish something yourself.

why you guys continue this pointless thread? OP just can't play this game and uses teams which are bad againts a counter team.
move on lol

"Treeburner;c-2036996" wrote:
Guys stop wasting your time .I have posted me wining with the team he said you can't with .
Now I will have to do it with Cody , sarge and Barris just t shut him up.

Arc is not the reason I win . It's the fact that I am smarter than the AI ,rex won a 4 Vs 1 with a turret holding him back by giving protection up due to the assists .I can clearly see ,by the way the goal post keep getting moved you are probably not smarter than the games dumb AI and this post will continue to grow untill you accomplish something yourself.

I see all the people I manhandled for like the last 40 msgs in this thread are giving you likes now. Glad to see they're off life support. Everything from rudeness, to misrepresentation, to dunderheadedness; I handled it all. Anybody got Sinatra cued up?

Now you're next. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO KEEPS CHANGING THE GOAL POSTS! If I was right about Shaak & the 501st with CS or Cody or Barriss, "shh, shh, reference ARC...no wait, use a Rex lead, no... and all 5 clones, um, and be sure not to show proof of facing an r7 Padme... and... "

If you're saying the turret gave you protection (I haven't used ARC yet), then it's fair to say ARC won that battle for you.Your daily regimen:? ?--> Shaak??----> Rex??-->Take out a 5th??-->Put in ARC??...

And so my original premise holds: Shaak, Rex, Echo, Fives & Clone Sarge won't do diddly vs. Padmé. But sure, if you can send a video that shows you selecting a full r7 Padme squad to fight & then winning with Barriss, Cody or CS, I'll look at it.

"Baby_Yoda;c-2037457" wrote:
@Kyno

Delete.

☝️Forums' #1 antagonist right here.