EP mass shock "potency" problem in RNG
Could you PLEASE look at your AI's use of "potency" in arena? Every time I go up against an EP lead, that EP stuns 4 or 5 of my team and when my mass shock is done, I mostly stun 1 or 2. My potency ...
Forum Discussion
"Whatelse73;c-1566610" wrote:"crzydroid;c-1561366" wrote:"Whatelse73;c-1561334" wrote:"Poxx;c-1561183" wrote:
Palpatine in a lead slot has 85% potency b4 any mods so unless u have toons w/ over 85% tenacity...again, b4 mods, u have a 15% chance to resist.
Right, but again, if I have MORE potency from mods and base before that 85% hits, then I should be stunning 4-5 more often than I am. Especially since the AI's EP stuns 4-5 as often as I stun 1-2. It just tells me that the AI favors itself in RNG, way too much and that shouldn't be the case.
I want to face another team and beat that TEAM. Not beat a suped up cheating AI.
At a certain point, it doesn't matter who has more potency. Once you hit the base 15% chance to resist, that's that. EP has a 70% chance to stun, so 0.70*.085 = 59.5% chance to stun any given toon. Your brain pays more attention to when rng is against you.
In your example of CLS, he gets 40% potency from his unique, so that would completely override 40% tenacity just there.
And, I understand that. All things being equal, our teams "should" be equal and my EP should mass shock 4 or 5 of the other team as often as the AI does it to me. However, that is not the case. My EP is shocking 1-2 most often, while your AI is shocking 4-5 most often. Since "it doesn't matter who has more potency", it means your AI is getting boosted, giving itself better odds, cheating, programmed to cheat, etc etc. :)
when it comes to an EP lead team and stuns, things are pretty much always equal given the base potency+lead bonus and the tenacity of all toons used in arena. So you're right about that.
I'm however willing to doubt that the AI is actually being boosted.
