GA Points?

Probably undersizing and having neater wins. That Old Republic team could be soloed by a relic Kylo Ren, for example. That gets a lot more points than using a normal team.

I think second try is a -20 point penalty, but I’m not sure.

The answer is right there on the map. The zones have the scoring info. At second attempt win will cost someone 20 points, not 40 points. If your defense was soft, it's possible to outpoint someone with a loss even if they get through clean if you're able to undersize a lot of battles.

I undersized 2 battles out of 10 for the extra points as well. He would have had to undersize all battles to make up for the missed points for the second battle.

2 out of 11*

"CoreyLivesPure;d-252426" wrote:

He is Russian as well.

Curious how this would matter

"CoreyLivesPure;c-2324524" wrote:
I undersized 2 battles out of 10 for the extra points as well. He would have had to undersize all battles to make up for the missed points for the second battle.

Just check the history on swgoh.gg when it's up. He only needs 36 points efficiency-wise to make up that loss. When you say 11 battles, is that squads or including fleet? With fleet is it 13? If you went in with full reinforcements and he didn't, that's extra points right there. And maybe he did undersize a lot of them. When you say you undersized two, what do you mean? Four-person teams? Two-person? Solos? How were your full-sized battles? Did you end with all protection?

Again, just wait until the history goes up and you'll see how it occured. But there is absolutely nothing immediately suspicious here.

"crzydroid;c-2324528" wrote:

"CoreyLivesPure;c-2324524" wrote:
I undersized 2 battles out of 10 for the extra points as well. He would have had to undersize all battles to make up for the missed points for the second battle.

Just check the history on swgoh.gg when it's up. He only needs 36 points efficiency-wise to make up that loss. When you say 11 battles, is that squads or including fleet? With fleet is it 13? If you went in with full reinforcements and he didn't, that's extra points right there. And maybe he did undersize a lot of them. When you say you undersized two, what do you mean? Four-person teams? Two-person? Solos? How were your full-sized battles? Did you end with all protection?

Again, just wait until the history goes up and you'll see how it occured. But there is absolutely nothing immediately suspicious here.

Didn’t even think about checking the History afterward, thanks!

I was specifically talking about ground battles. But I did undersize one fleet without two ships. My ground undersize battles were 4-man teams. 1 battle with max points and 1 with a missed point to one toon missing a little protection.

"CoreyLivesPure;d-252426" wrote:


He is Russian as well.

Oh well there you go, if you're Russian you get bonus points.

"TVF;c-2324552" wrote:

"CoreyLivesPure;d-252426" wrote:


He is Russian as well.

Oh well there you go, if you're Russian you get bonus points.

Everyone knows that, TVF! You must be new to the forums.

A single ship battle alone can have a 20 point swing. If you take no reinforcements and end with decent health and protection 75 points is very attainable. If you take a full fleet and lose 3 ships you quickly fall to under 60.

If you only undersize by 1 toon on a bunch of battles, and only undersized fleet by 2 reinforcements you are making yourself very beatable.

Just the one zone you took a picture of had an easy full point solo win, and a pretty easy duo win shown on it.