GLs have ruined TW and GAC.

"Buffems;d-235681" wrote:
GLs have ruined TW and GAC. At least for those of us that don't have one.
Before GLs everyone one had a far and equal change of winning ( for the most part).
Now if my opponent has a GL I might as well not even bother trying. It'll take at minimum 2 squads to beat lowering my banner count.
I'm well aware there are counters out there, but these counters break up others squads potentially cause me to lose another battle. In TW (especially recently) we have come up against guilds with twice the number of GLs that my guild has. How is this fair?
I believe GLs should not be allowed in TW and GAC to keep things fair and balanced. It'll also make TW and GAC fun again.

Same thing was said about almost every other meta the game has had so far

The GLs were very tough grind (evident as you don't have one) so its only fair that if there are any counter to them, they require great investment and break teams up if you don't mirror them

Its fair because these players worked hard to unlock and gear those Galactic Legends, while you didn't

Its unfair to them to work towards something only to be banned because you don't like countering them or getting one yourself. GACs are fair and balanced even with them present. Players with two GLs can lose to players with no Galactic Legends

It's not fair to be matched up against an opponent that as a GL when I don't.
I'm well aware it's a grind to get them, but why should players without a GL be put up against players that do. That's the unfair part.
They can rule the arena, I don't care about that.
But the other aspects of the game should be fair for everyone.
And come on. GLs are beyond OP and completely unbalanced. Everyone knows that.

"Buffems;c-2166700" wrote:
And come on. GLs are beyond OP and completely unbalanced. Everyone knows that.

They have multiple counters, so they are not beyond OP or completely unbalanced

You have sizeable amount of investment in your top 80 to make up for the difference of not having a GL

If you want to be competitive in competitive game modes, then you need to work on your counters. What CG is doing is not unfair

"Buffems;c-2166703" wrote:
All I'm really saying is if my opponent has a GL I should have one too.

You have a comparable top {x} character GP. Your opponent allocated a big chunk of theirs to a GL and the associated prerequisite bloat. How you allocated yours is on you.

"Buffems;c-2166703" wrote:
Same for TW. If my guild has 12 then the opposing guild should have 12 not 24.

Again, you have comparable GP. How you allocated it is on you.

None of this is new.

"Buffems;c-2166726" wrote:
I think you're missing the point.
I don't a GL. I'm working on it.
Other do have a GL. That's great good for them.
Why am I matched up against those with GLs.
Go fight someone with a GL. Leave me be.
That's the unfair part. The match making system.

People with no GLs are able to beat 2 GLs

tell me how players are winning if its unfair

We've told you why you are being matched

You are working on them too slow, the requirements have been slowly released since January of this year

"Buffems;c-2166710" wrote:
Easy for you to say when you have a GL.

You think I didn't struggle when I was chasing a GL with an inflated roster? They did a slow crawl reveal of requirements since early January that gave me a couple of seasons where opponents with a leaner roster that were ignoring GLs had an upper hand, but I didn't cry over it

"Buffems;c-2166700" wrote:
It's not fair to be matched up against an opponent that as a GL when I don't.

If you have matching top-X GP, division and league it's perfectly fair. Even and fair are (still) two different things.

"Buffems;d-235681" wrote:

I'm well aware there are counters out there, but these counters break up others squads potentially causing me to lose another battle.

It depends on how you look at it. Sometimes having a GL can be a disadvantage. Getting a GL requires 12 other high relic characters, some of which aren’t all that great. What 13 characters do you have that they don’t, since you must have a similar top 80 GP? If you can beat their GL, even if it breaks up 2 squads, you can still have an advantage in those 8 other characters or however it’s spread out throughout the roster.

"Buffems;c-2166710" wrote:
Easy for you to say when you have a GL.

If that was to me, I don't have a GL and I am managing my roster buildup such that I am unlikely to encounter one until I am ready to do so.

You control your roster choices.

"Buffems;c-2166700" wrote:
It's not fair to be matched up against an opponent that as a GL when I don't.
I'm well aware it's a grind to get them, but why should players without a GL be put up against players that do. That's the unfair part.
They can rule the arena, I don't care about that.
But the other aspects of the game should be fair for everyone.
And come on. GLs are beyond OP and completely unbalanced. Everyone knows that.

It's not fair you can get better rewards for not having a gl and thus getting an easier matchup? So if you want to not face gl, then the non GL bracket would need lower rewards

"Buffems;c-2166710" wrote:
Easy for you to say when you have a GL.

I don't have either GL and I have been matched against both a SLKR (ultimate) and Rey (no ultimate) this GAC season and I just moved up to Div 3 for this season. I have no interest in either Kylo or Rey so I worked on counters and regularly spend crystals in arena to practice against the GL's that are in my arena shard.

I beat them both and full cleared and they were unable to get a clear as the rest of their roster at that GP level is pretty crap if they have focused solely on a GL. Not saying they shouldn't have done that as I'm sure arena is much easier for them and the crystal income from arena is way more important than the rewards from GAC imo.

But, if you are not willing or able to get a GL, work on counters and life gets a whole lot easier.