GRAND ARENA

"MasterJediBrian;d-221770" wrote:
GRAND ARENA needs to stop saying Round 1/3 when this is our 7th battle. Either indicate 7/9 or call each set of 3 battles a round, making this Round 3, battle 1/3.

It is round 1/3 at the start of each GA. There are three rounds in a GA. There are 4 GAs in a GAC. Your second proposal or something like, "GA 3, Round 1/3" makes the most sense.

#literallyunplayable

"MasterJediBrian;c-2038991" wrote:

"Baby_Yoda;c-2038981" wrote:
Its literally not a problem.

You may not "feel" it's a problem, but when things can be clearer for everyone, I wish you'd just be more supportive.

Supportive forums?

"MasterJediBrian;c-2039142" wrote:

"TVF;c-2039051" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2038991" wrote:

"Baby_Yoda;c-2038981" wrote:
Its literally not a problem.

You may not "feel" it's a problem, but when things can be clearer for everyone, I wish you'd just be more supportive.

Supportive forums?

Answer: No

Would be a nice touch, but then not everyone signs up for every round. Not a big deal to me, but we know people make issues on here for far less.

"TVF;c-2037846" wrote:
#literallyunplayable

Well we won't hold out for you to be agreeable TVF. Your brevity on the other hand, masterful.

With 4 zones on the board, there are more than 3 battles each round. Regardless of division ?
The term battle exists already, and its definition totally differs from your suggestion. As the term is used in ability descriptions as well, you should rework your thread

"Kalano;c-2038464" wrote:
With 4 zones on the board, there are more than 3 battles each round. Regardless of division ?
The term battle exists already, and its definition totally differs from your suggestion. As the term is used in ability descriptions as well, you should rework your thread

"Rework my thread" ☺️?"How much reworking is there in substituting "match" for "battle"? ---> ?️‍♂️⬇️⬆️?"Aaaghh, killer rework!"

"MasterJediBrian;c-2038515" wrote:

"Kalano;c-2038464" wrote:
With 4 zones on the board, there are more than 3 battles each round. Regardless of division ?
The term battle exists already, and its definition totally differs from your suggestion. As the term is used in ability descriptions as well, you should rework your thread

"Rework my thread" ☺️?"How much reworking is there in substituting "match" for "battle"? ---> ?️‍♂️⬇️⬆️?"Aaaghh, killer rework!"

How about just keeping the current wordings?

There are 3 rounds to a GA and 4 GAs to a GAC.

Why create confusion by changing it?

But OK, it may be helpful for some to indicate which of the 4 GAs is currently running. Not really needed, since you can deduct that from your score or the overall rankings, but a nice to have feature. I wouldn't give that feature high priority, though. My strategy is not affected by whether it's the 1st or 4th GA.

"Waqui;c-2038543" wrote:

"MasterJediBrian;c-2038515" wrote:

"Kalano;c-2038464" wrote:
With 4 zones on the board, there are more than 3 battles each round. Regardless of division ?
The term battle exists already, and its definition totally differs from your suggestion. As the term is used in ability descriptions as well, you should rework your thread

"Rework my thread" ☺️?"How much reworking is there in substituting "match" for "battle"? ---> ?️‍♂️⬇️⬆️?"Aaaghh, killer rework!"

How about just keeping the current wordings?

There are 3 rounds to a GA and 4 GAs to a GAC.

Why create confusion by changing it?

But OK, it may be helpful for some to indicate which of the 4 GAs is currently running. Not really needed, since you can deduct that from your score or the overall rankings, but a nice to have feature. I wouldn't give that feature high priority, though. My strategy is not affected by whether it's the 1st or 4th GA.

Every Event tries to make clear the current stage (3rd set of 5, 5th inning of 9, 4th game of a 7 game series. It's just sloppy to keep posting Round 1/3 without indicating how far along we are in either GA or GAC)