Forum Discussion

starwarsboy1995's avatar
4 years ago

Hera’s Zeta

With GAC requiring more squads, can we have a touch up for Hera’s zeta to cleanse the debuffs prior to attacking. I know some will say this isn’t a big deal, but all other assists like hers remove debuffs first. I know Phoenix isn’t competitive, but for GAC we need all the squads we can get
  • Use your zeta's for something else.
    Phoenix are not that good, if you use them on defense, they'll be good enough without their zeta's
  • "Eevee;c-2269390" wrote:
    I mean ones with a cleanse. Jolee. JTR. Bastila.


    jolee's assist doesn't cleanse. Only his revive ability cleanses
  • Don't spend such a precious resource on it for now.
    Place your first zeta in Bastila Shan. Show your swgoh.gg account so we can assess if there are other options for zeta help.

    Ps: if a moderator moves to new players
  • Oh, I understand there are others that are better options. I’ve saturated my zetas for meta teams. I primarily use Phoenix for offense, so having the little change would be nice. Plus I’m watching rebels, so I’m biased ?
  • Mate I understand that has I liked the rebels show. However it’s not worth it as you don’t need pheonix once you have 7* Thrawn. Besides enfys nest can solo a pheonix team
  • "LukesSkywalkers8976;c-2269350" wrote:
    Mate I understand that has I liked the rebels show. However it’s not worth it as you don’t need pheonix once you have 7* Thrawn. Besides enfys nest can solo a pheonix team


    You know what would be a fun GAC defense? Just Nest, and watch as the defenders struggle to get past the bonus protection. But I do agree on your points, and I also thought that Rebels was good.
  • "Eevee;d-246064" wrote:
    With GAC requiring more squads, can we have a touch up for Hera’s zeta to cleanse the debuffs prior to attacking. I know some will say this isn’t a big deal, but all other assists like hers remove debuffs first. I know Phoenix isn’t competitive, but for GAC we need all the squads we can get


    No, they don't.