"Drepd;c-1169343" wrote:
"JacenRoe;c-1168968" wrote:
If I had unlimited resources I'd love to test either:
A. IGD lead, Kit Fisto, Aayla, Zarris, Kanan.
B. IGD lead, GK, Aayla, Zarris, Kanan
Might not be able to break into the meta, but it might be decent. Probably a meta shift, or faction pass, or new toon from being legit. Just not top notch right now.
I don't understand why you would want a taunter in a counter attack group. if his taunt is up, he would be the only one ever counter attacking unless everyone is aoe'd . defeats the purpose of a counter attack team if no one is counter attacking except Kanan.
Besides the fact that his counter attack chance would be 100% under IGD? There is the fact that every good arena team has one if not several dispellers. A taunt isn't a permanent thing. Taunting currently in arena is a distraction. That's partly why many top arena teams use Baze and GK. It's hard to target attackers or other threats while being bounced between two taunts. In most of my arena battles taunts are dispelled multiple times on both sides.
The idea here is that they keep trying to get an attacker down, but they keep having to cut through two taunters (if you use Kanan, and GK). By the time they cut through a counter attacking tank who is lowering their offense on every counter, you have damaged them pretty well with all of your attacks and counter attacks. Then if they kill him they have to try to cut through tanky counter attackers with already damaged characters.
Anyhow, it might have done well in days of old, but in the modern meta with characters who can daze, and instakill it probably wouldn't hold up.