Level 1 GAC

You get matched on top {x} GP, not total GP. This is not new.

You relic'd a lot of First Order characters pursuing Supreme Leader Kylo Ren, bloating your top {x} GP in the process.

You have Supreme Leader Kylo. Congratulations! Now you need to learn to live with your choices in GAC.

"Chrislee004;c-2113550" wrote:
So many tough guys on the internet I see

Some of them even understand how GAC and matchmaking works. You should try to learn some day too.

"Mephisto_style;c-2113657" wrote:

"TVF;c-2113591" wrote:

"Mephisto_style;c-2113576" wrote:

"Jarvind;c-2112297" wrote:
If you get a match with this huge of a discrepancy, the other guy has a super fluffy roster and is probably not very good. Immediately balking at matchmaking due purely to GP is the call of the scrub.

More than half the time I have faced an opponent with 200,000 GP when I inspect their mods, I crush them there. I think the matching is based on more than just top 50 or 80 GP. It would be nice to see the method.

You can think whatever you want but they already gave us the method.

Seeing the method is not the same as experiencing the end-result of the method acting on you. I was t to see the code's parameters

And what exactly would you do if you saw "the code's parameters", hmmm? Would you even know what you were looking at?

"MaruMaru;c-2114335" wrote:

"Mephisto_style;c-2114329" wrote:

"MaruMaru;c-2113922" wrote:

"Rath_Tarr;c-2113669" wrote:

"Mephisto_style;c-2113657" wrote:

"TVF;c-2113591" wrote:

"Mephisto_style;c-2113576" wrote:

"Jarvind;c-2112297" wrote:
If you get a match with this huge of a discrepancy, the other guy has a super fluffy roster and is probably not very good. Immediately balking at matchmaking due purely to GP is the call of the scrub.

More than half the time I have faced an opponent with 200,000 GP when I inspect their mods, I crush them there. I think the matching is based on more than just top 50 or 80 GP. It would be nice to see the method.

You can think whatever you want but they already gave us the method.

Seeing the method is not the same as experiencing the end-result of the method acting on you. I was t to see the code's parameters

And what exactly would you do if you saw "the code's parameters", hmmm? Would you even know what you were looking at?

He/she obviously means how it works, not the spagetti itself.

I can interpret various languages of spaghetti. I will say though, biblical Hebrew was above my capability at the time. I wouldn't mind giving it another shot

Believe me, cg code might turn out to be worse than flying spagetti monster.

Praise his noodly appendages!

I’m 5.8, just lost to a 4.7. They had a leaner and meaner roster.

As mentioned in other posts... Top GP matchmaking will run in issues once you have maxed out the top toons. Because of this reason, the matchmaking will always be unfair.

"Akenno;c-2111759" wrote:
As mentioned in other posts... Top GP matchmaking will run in issues once you have maxed out the top toons. Because of this reason, the matchmaking will always be unfair.

As mentioned in other posts in 5v5 round winners use only a couple more than those X characters (number of defensive slots x 10 if 5v5) on average. They don't use many more teams than (number of defensive slots x 2) teams to win. Those are myths.

Yes, they may use characters outside that top-X, but that's only to leave some of that top-X unused. Top-X GP matching is as close to matching the GP of the X (+ only a couple more ) characters actually used as you can realistically get.

"Waqui;c-2111770" wrote:

"Akenno;c-2111759" wrote:
As mentioned in other posts... Top GP matchmaking will run in issues once you have maxed out the top toons. Because of this reason, the matchmaking will always be unfair.

As mentioned in other posts in 5v5 round winners use only a couple more than those X characters (number of defensive slots x 10 if 5v5) on average. They don't use many more teams than (number of defensive slots x 2) teams to win. Those are myths.

Yes, they may use characters outside that top-X, but that's only to leave some of that top-X unused. Top-X GP matching is as close to matching the GP of the X (+ only a couple more ) characters actually used as you can realistically get.

The real myth is you thinking you know what all round winners use to win. I’ve had lots of battles that weren’t won on either side by one shot full clearing and did require more than a couple chars outside top X.

At the top of divisions, maybe it’s more often about one shot full clearing on efficiency, but don’t claim to know how all rounds are won.

"ZAP;c-2111868" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2111770" wrote:

"Akenno;c-2111759" wrote:
As mentioned in other posts... Top GP matchmaking will run in issues once you have maxed out the top toons. Because of this reason, the matchmaking will always be unfair.

As mentioned in other posts in 5v5 round winners use only a couple more than those X characters (number of defensive slots x 10 if 5v5) on average. They don't use many more teams than (number of defensive slots x 2) teams to win. Those are myths.

Yes, they may use characters outside that top-X, but that's only to leave some of that top-X unused. Top-X GP matching is as close to matching the GP of the X (+ only a couple more ) characters actually used as you can realistically get.

The real myth is you thinking you know what all round winners use to win. I’ve had lots of battles that weren’t won on either side by one shot full clearing and did require more than a couple chars outside top X.

At the top of divisions, maybe it’s more often about one shot full clearing on efficiency, but don’t claim to know how all rounds are won.

Waqui is a pretty smart player that analyzes situations pretty accurately.

"Rath_Tarr;c-2111747" wrote:
You get matched on top {x} GP, not total GP. This is not new.

You relic'd a lot of First Order characters pursuing Supreme Leader Kylo Ren, bloating your top {x} GP in the process.

You have Supreme Leader Kylo. Congratulations! Now you need to learn to live with your choices in GAC.

Do we know if it is top 60 or 80? I've seen both numbers floated but can't tell.