Lord Vader Potential Balance Issues
CG, thanks for checking this issue. Since your last update, LV struggles a lot more against other GLs like JMK and JML. I used the same starting squad (LV, maul, RG, DV, piett) before and after agains...
Forum Discussion
"SemiGod;c-2339164" wrote:"Gifafi;c-2339158" wrote:
I’m confused, people are outraged that a gl that’s better on offense is better on offense? This feels like someone r9-ing their troopers then being upset they lost to a lesser team on d.
JMK is god tier on both defense & offense, LV Maul is supposed to be a tier above the first 4 GLs and on the same level of not higher than JMK cat (based on CG past statements & their idea of investment). He gets poor banners on offense and has many cheap counters on defense.
Don’t know where you concluded that LV is an offense GL, I’m pretty sure he’s more commonly placed on defense because of his lack of power.
He’s placed on d BECAUSE of a lack of power? Lol what is going on?? His banners seem fine to me on offense
"Sithlords_Inc;c-2339169" wrote:"Gifafi;c-2339158" wrote:
I’m confused, people are outraged that a gl that’s better on offense is better on offense? This feels like someone r9-ing their troopers then being upset they lost to a lesser team on d.
LV is probably close to being the 3rd best offensive GL while arguably being the worst on defence. Not even SEE has so many non-GL counters these days. That not even mentioning that LV has the highest requirements out of all GLs, or that he requires a conquest-character to even perform ok. Meanwhile his LS counterpart which was released before him is probably the best defensive AND offensive GL. How is this hard for you to understand?
Why would you put a team with a bunch of non-gl counters on d? I’m all for a vader buff, or any gl buff, but it makes no sense to complain about you using him wrong. This was my imp troopers point above.
