Forum Discussion
6 years ago
Now the final step in comparative analysis is to set the secondary procs as equal and measure the value of primary stats and set bonuses in terms of procs. So to finish I give you this chart that equates primary and set values with number of secondary procs they are equal to:
A value of 5 is average, Values above that are good, below it are bad.
We can see that tenacity, potency and crit chance primaries all have a really good value in terms of secondary procs, whereas Pretty much only defense and tenacity sets have good value in terms of secondary procs, and cc's value is atrocious.
Speed set would be 1.53721 procs at best but it could be much worse. Which makes it very bad at it's very best since 5 is basically 0 (below it is negative, above it is positive). CD triangle has a 2.8 value compared to the set. Can't compare CD secondaries because there are none. Offense, CD and Speed set values were halved since they are 4 piece sets.
A value of 5 is average, Values above that are good, below it are bad.
We can see that tenacity, potency and crit chance primaries all have a really good value in terms of secondary procs, whereas Pretty much only defense and tenacity sets have good value in terms of secondary procs, and cc's value is atrocious.
Speed set would be 1.53721 procs at best but it could be much worse. Which makes it very bad at it's very best since 5 is basically 0 (below it is negative, above it is positive). CD triangle has a 2.8 value compared to the set. Can't compare CD secondaries because there are none. Offense, CD and Speed set values were halved since they are 4 piece sets.
About SWGOH Strategy & Tips
Share guides, tips, and tricks for Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes, discuss Arena strats, and help new players get started.22,755 PostsLatest Activity: 8 hours ago
Related Posts
Recent Discussions
- 2 days ago
- 6 days ago
- 9 days ago