The end of critical damage mod sets?
The way the game is going with g12+ and now g13 there is a significant increase in characters base stats. So much so that percent based mod sets such as health and offense are becoming more important....
Forum Discussion
Get off your high horse and go look it up. And maybe learn what a question mark is too, you know the one at the start of the thread. Hence me saying it was a question. Imagine sending for people giving it big man and looking like a complete idiot, see yourself out you muppet.
"JacenRoe;c-1907375" wrote:"Rosstheboss89;c-1907325" wrote:
Why you got to get all muggy in the replies!? Keyboard warrior.
Thread was started as a genuine question as I’ve noticed less people use CD now as opposed to before.
That’s been cleared up with the whole physical damage and crit chance vs special damage and special crit ratios.
God forbid anyone asks a question or has a debate without your say so."JacenRoe;c-1907315" wrote:"Kokie;c-1907259" wrote:
32% of players go with CD set vs 17% offense on HK....I just felt like throwing numbers out too
77% of adults believe they can text without it affecting their driving. Majorities are not inherently right. 47% of all people know that you can prove anything with statistics. Especially if they are made up.
As for CD sets, no. They are not going away. We went from a situation initially where there was almost no reason to ever use offense mod sets for attackers to one where there are uses for both depending on the kit and other stats. And critical hits do more damage... if you have higher offense. More offense is great for CD. This thread was clearly started by someone who doesn't understand how crit damage works.
You didn't say, 'I'm not sure how CD mods work. Is there a reason I am noticing people using them less?' You asked an overly dramatic question. Applause for the click bait title though.
While we're on the subject, I don't know what "muggy" means in the context of an internet slang/insult. Should I ask if the English language has degraded into incomprehensible gibberish, and then argue with anyone who says otherwise? Or instead should I just say, 'here is something I don't know about. Could someone shed light on it?'
Nevermind. I'll choose option three. I'll look it up myself.
