The Return Of The Droids Hk-47 Lead Is Back!!
A fruitful day to all & may the force be with you. Its been a while i posted anything & for good reason to first i didnt wan to post content that isnt original secondly i was jailed in this forum &...
Forum Discussion
"InstantDoneWithYou;c-1621403" wrote:"Kyno;c-1620881" wrote:"Damodamo;c-1620786" wrote:
@InstantDoneWithYou I don’t troll, I simply ask you to back up claims as to how good a team is or isn’t. You haven’t as yet provided a link to your roster, simply to provide context as to whether your speaking from experience or whether it’s an on paper exercise.
If that is trolling by your definition then please try and widen your understanding of what the word means.
I have messaged @SamuraiUX to clear up any misunderstanding.
As to you saying that I think I’m better than you/anyone, that is unfair and not what I said. I would like to know about your shard/roster/guild as sweeping statements about tw defense records is lovely, but anyone can say they never lose, but without context your talking kitten.
@Damodamo
I believe almost all (if not all) of their theory crafting is on paper and not based on any experience.
OP - the reason many people have this and similar questions about your experience and roster is that theory crafting for arena teams has to take into account the AI. Not having used a team or most of the members usually leads to an inflated reliance on synergy that is not always practical.
There have been many teams over time that could win against some powerful metas, but the AI was junk and would cause you to lose and/or be targeted at a higher rate. Winning on O is not the meta, the meta is holding on D, and unfortunately that is heavily reliant on the AI.
Kyno Big man its not always about meta but there are some people who love diversity also some people have these teams i suggest and dont know how to combine them. Its about giving a competitive edge to those who don't have a flamboyant roster
I understand, the point I was trying to make is that even though they look "competitive" on paper, they may not be and you can only flesh out these ideas with practice.
As I said, there have been many teams over the years that were not meta and could make short work of the meta, but fell flat due to the AI control.
Competitive is not about winning on offense, it's about maximum net payout, at the least amount of effort.
