"scuba;c-1068768" wrote:
"Woodroward;c-1068733" wrote:
"scuba;c-1068376" wrote:
"Woodroward;c-1067872" wrote:
scuba There is certainly something a little goofy with the way it works. I'm getting the feeling that if he has double buffs, the effect will apply both right when it happens and at the end of the turn so it's entirely possible that clearing the buffs might keep the second application from happening.
The buff is not what is giving him the 100% tm gain, I don't know why you keep circling back to this.
There is some weird interaction going on with the dot damage and tactical manuerving ability.
Your giving me **** over semantics man. The buff and the ability both come from the ability. I don't care which gives him the tm, they both come from the same place.
Only because it sound to me like you keep saying if you remove the debuff it will stop him from gaining the 100% TM from the ability
"Woodroward;c-1067872" wrote:
scuba There is certainly something a little goofy with the way it works. I'm getting the feeling that if he has double buffs, the effect will apply both right when it happens and at the end of the turn so it's entirely possible that clearing the buffs might keep the second application from happening.
Because it might. He gets tm insanely fast while he has the buff EVEN IF I don't hit anybody. The ability does NOT work exactly as it is described with 100% certainty. Whether it is the buff or the ability that is giving him tm removing the buff will slow him down. If your correction made a difference to the conversation at hand, I would have acknowledged it, but it doesn't. hence why it is semantics.
I had edited my above post. Please see the elaboration.
