Ventress vs. MT Lead
Hi everyone, I'm really hesitating between the two and would be really grateful if you could share what you believe are the pros and cons of each. My shard is pretty mixed atm with CLS, GZarris...
Forum Discussion
"Billcarson66;c-1400161" wrote:
Well, in my experience, zeta MT lead is more a pain in the butt, but Zeta Assaj lead is better for arena. I have a zeta on MT unique and Assaj leader. I have one guy with the best mods on my January 17 shard running a full Ns team under zet Talzin. I run a mixed CLS squad.
I can’t beat him except when I run my very poorly modded NS squad under my Ventress.. his team is miles faster. But they don’t go. My plague wipes his Acolyte cheese and both our Ventress quickly ramp up to 40k damage, but I jut take way more turns so I win.
I haven’t even zetad Ventress unique yet, but will eventually. So my advice is if you want to go full NS, talzin lead is more annoying for other players, but Assaj lead makes offense easier. Talzin becomes aoe TM remover....that is huge in arena.
Running Talzin lead you would want all NS. Under Assaj consider Zarris to let you last longer til Ventress takes out everyone with one AOE.
Thanks for the reply, much appreciated!
I agree on MT being more of a pain on D because RNG can still gives you some nasty surprises. But is Ventress that bad on D against let's say a GK/Zarriss or the typical CLS meta team?
