7 years ago
Wampa not worth it!
im 10 shards out of the 7* wampa team and have the last piece of gear to bump to gear 12 but im hear to say wampa is nothing. The only good parts of the wampa are the daze AoE+ the protection gain and...
"RulingKesteral;c-1603076" wrote:"DaPowerfulJedi;c-1603067" wrote:"RulingKesteral;c-1603056" wrote:
I've read all of your comment and still believe wampa is not worth it without stun immunity.
Jyn and Traya are the only characters I can think of with stun immunity, and you need their zetas (Traya’s not even immune, she just dispels it). Come on, you can’t say a great character is bad because they can be stunned. By this logic, Thrawn is terrible, CLS is terrible, Sion is terrible, Nest is terrible, and Palpatine is terrible if they ever get stunned.
Excuse me have you checked basic states for all those characters and looked at tenacity? thrawn is WAY better than Wampa being more versatile plus his leader ability makes wampa a nobody again in speed. Cls dispels himself,while gaingig health and protection, gets an extra turn also has counter stuns applies speed down and his ledre ablity,while absolute against daze has far more versatility again, now sion can 1-1 wampa and win, look it up, and again is way way way more versatile in other teams because he can come back to life (its okay to get stunned sometimes and die if your coming back to life DUH) and nest is the cheap yet more synergistic wampa, and lastly EP does blow compared to wampa unless he is a double zeta leader then again your wampa has one tiny tailored area of usefulness. and to address your statement of zeta required stun immunity. DUH! of course it would require a zeta. I have to say someone who decides to echo spock your logic i flawed and insensible.