Why does JMK only go for Armorer?!?

"petersphilo;c-2299931" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2299734" wrote:

"Shnel;c-2299732" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2299726" wrote:

"petersphilo;d-249528" wrote:
There is absolutely no justification for making JMK focus only on Armorer!!

The justification is that it makes JMK a better team on defense, and as a JMK owner, I am glad the AI is being smart

"If (armorer in oposedteam) attack(armorer)" is very far from smart ai. It is actually called very stupid programming. As a jmk owner i am not glad. Also if the nerfs were a big lie from cg, switching from gl balance to gl hierarchy is another big lie from cg (all gl are equal). If there was some irony, sorry for not getting it, but this hole ahead is not funny anymore.

Is it a bad AI decision if it prevents some of the counters towards JMK?

Yes, it is..
First, as has been pointed out above, there’s nothing AI about what’s happening here..
Second, also as was pointed out above, GLs are supposed to be able to counter each other, but preventing SEE from relying on Armorer basically prevents the one reliable counter to JMK + CAT (aside from mirror)
This whole game is supposed to be based on rng.. there’s no rng here..
I hope, against hope, that CG see the error of their ways!

“If Armorer is present, kill Armorer” may not be the smartest form of AI/coding, but it’s smarter than the usual “pick a number between 1 and 5 and kill that thing”.

Also, it’s pretty clear that this point that GLs are only supposed to counter GLs that don’t have their Unaligned Force User friends. Even if you could get the 3 Beskar Stacks on SEE, JMK+CAT will shred him to pieces with that Ult change.

Should that be how it is? I wish it wasn’t, but the game’s got to grow somehow. And as for the AI change, it makes sense from what a Defending Player would do and from a change-the-least-possible perspective.