"JoAnne65;c-16408445" wrote:
"MzPigglyPooh;c-16408383" wrote:
"JoAnne65;c-16408291" wrote:
"Luke;c-16408065" wrote:
@MzPigglyPooh Honestly, go back to earlier iterations. I've revisited TS2 here and there. The reason I don't play it all the time is that it feels a little bit outdated. I like the Gallery function because it makes the game feel a lot more relevant. Because even though I don't want or care about an online Sims game, I do think that content sharing brings the community into your game so that you do feel connected. I also would love a co-op version of the game ... I don't care about online, but sometimes I think it would be really cool to play a world with max 3 other people and you all collectively build an entire world together. I think that would be cool.
Anyways, point is, go back to earlier versions if you are unhappy. It will make you appreciate certain things about TS4 and remind you of how great the older versions were.
No, that is not the point. The point is what the OP says the point is and the OP clearly wants to discuss the future of the franchise, not the past.
Honestly if they keep going the way they are there is no future for this franchise. At least for me. I won't be supporting any more of things being broken up as they have been. I see it as they've been continuously getting away with it so they're going to just keep doing it. They've gotten enough money from me.
Yes. I love playing the predecessor of Sims 4, still do (and it doesn’t feel dated to me either). But when I want to discuss my experiences with Sims 3 I turn to the Sims 3 section. The reason I’m here (and I can’t imagine this doesn’t go for others) is because I’m also still interested in the future. My hopes for Sims 4 have faded as well but who knows they’ll surprise us. And who knows there will be this successor we can all love again. Anyway, that’s what we’re here for. Not to hear “go play Sims 2 or 3” again and again.
@keekee53 I’m not under the impression you are taking much effort to understand what I’m saying either. It’s not subjective, it’s factual. You cannot compare the unfinished C&D EP to any EP in the past, least of all by drawing the Store into the discussion. And you can’t prove your point about ‘breaking up content’ in the past by using examples of items and features that were linked to something else. All you’re doing by this “they’ve always done this” arguments is trying to downplay the - very legit - concerns of the OP.
Believe what you want and say what you will. OP asked if anyone else is concerned. I said I wasn't concerned at first because they have done this in the past. It was only this last stuff pack I had a concern with.
As I said, you are missing my point and I was on topic again and again. I went through scenarios to explain why I feel the way I do and how I saw things happen before. I am not trying to trash either game and you are blowing this up into a Sims 3 vs Sims 4 and it isn't. Generations was not a complete expansion because it was missing a world SUBJECTIVE. Other people think it is a complete expansion SUBJECTIVE.
I used Sims 3 it as an example just like other people use past iterations to bring home their point as well. Many times people have used Sims 2 bowling to show that Sims 4 bowling is terrible. Should we grab pitchforks and tell them not to bring up sims 2 as well..come on.
You really don't think the greenhouse should have been part of Seasons...if they pulled that in Sims 4, people would be going crazy...lol In Sims 2, we got greenhouses with seasons.
