Carl's Guide: A History of the Sims 4

"CAPTAIN_NXR7;c-17838801" wrote:
@SimmerGeorge , @Mstybl95 ,

Thanks for the history lesson. I believe you. I never said that the modding community wasn’t huge already. I’m sure it was. I just think it’s bigger, but hey, perhaps that’s just an illusion. And yes perhaps it’s this big because some folks see it as an easy way to make a quick buck but I also believe that EA could see it as a way to generate more money. That’s all I’m saying. I could be totally wrong. Right now I hope I am. But who knows.

"Mstybl95;c-17838717" wrote:

And I can deny that TS2 looks aged. As someone who still plays it regularly, I can tell you that my game looks great. I actually have 90% of the same CC in TS2 that I have in TS4. And it works better in TS2 because doing something out of passion is a lot different from people just trying to make an easy buck.

I didn’t say TS2 looks aged or doesn’t look great. I said TS4 looks that bit smoother in comparison. And in my opinion it looks better. Again, whichever look we prefer is subjective.
I’m not a modder or a cc creator. I’m an end user and there’s only a handful of modders and cc creators who’s content is worthy enough to end up in any of my games. I can see the difference between content that has been created with skill and passion and content that has been rushed by someone with absolutely 0 eye for detail. That has nothing to do with for whatever game that content was created.

@CAPTAIN_NXR7 I mean doesn't matter if you like the Sims 4 art style or not, it is still graphically superior compared to the previous games cause technological leap. So yeah I agree it looks a lot smoother, and in general better than the 15 or 20 year old Sims games. It's not up for debate to say it has better graphics, it is pretty much a fact. But yeah the art style does bother some people, not me personally. However the art style is more of a subjective thing.