Forum Discussion
7 years ago
"DreamaDove;c-16792529" wrote:"Cynna;c-16792349" wrote:
More and more, I suspect that GF was originally intended to be a game pack. It seems as if EA has been doing some on the fly repackaging in response to community complaints.
That's my unsolicited two cents. ::shrug::
ETA: I'm all for restructuring the release of content -- if that is what GF signifies. It's a new beginning that can lead to so much more down the line. The tons of SPs and GPs weren't cutting it.
I was talking about this earlier at the forums:
- small world barely larger than selvadorada, a gamepack
- 2 'expansions' in one year, something they've never done
- extreme focus, like a gamepack
- using the system from vampires, another gamepack
it's like, they just added a few more items and hairs so they could charge DOUBLE.
Yes.
Due to what I've seen, I'm almost always pessimistic about TS4. Yet, for some reason, this time, I'm thinking that this can be a positive thing.
My fervent hope is that they decided to mash together what they had pending and, from now on, packs will be dedicated EPs from conception. EPs that are as full and comprehensive as what nearly two decades of this series has led the community to expect from The Sims brand.
If I'm wrong, though... ::sigh::
I truly hope that I'm correct about GF being a symptom of hasty restructuring, not a blatant attempt at shilling a longstanding fan base. Because with the copious SPs and GPs, and inadequate EPs, the shilling was already happening.
EA, please let GF be a last gasp of that un- Sim worthy marketing and release strategy that TS4 launched with. Please.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.
33,185 PostsLatest Activity: 8 hours agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 3 hours ago
- 6 hours ago