do the gurus actually look at this forum?

"JoAnne65;c-16809300" wrote:

I disagree. I’ve seen numerous, very thorough, well phrased topics that went into detail how people would want to see emotions handled, or personalities, the auras, the traits, customizability (or rather the lack of it), you name it and people have pointed out their issues and also elaborated how they’d like to see it in a most constructive way that may feel like bellyaching when you don’t agree, but that doesn’t make it less profound and constructive.

I don't get that. Whether or not I agree with something has virtually nothing to do with whether or not it's constructive. Sometimes someone is just bellyaching and I agree with it. Then there are also times when someone is being constructive but I don't agree with their ideas or what they're saying. There is no correlation. Numerous posts with detailed and constructive feedback exist, yes, but far more numerous are the amount of "xyz is garbage, fix it" posts that are much easier to come by.

"JoAnne65;c-16809300" wrote:
“We want it to look better, it looks very poor.” I mean, people were right about that and it was so obvious that not a lot more was needed for an argument, but I wouldn’t call that subject a feast of constructive criticism.

I didn't call it one either