"bellagoth_;c-17596268" wrote:
"Calico45;c-17596264" wrote:
"crocobaura;c-17596260" wrote:
"Calico45;c-17596255" wrote:
"bellagoth_;c-17596240" wrote:
wait even better,
imagine paying 50 dollars for a lacking expansion pack that got half its content put in 3 different packs
Now imagine paying $100 so that your gun looks pretty but functions the exact same way. That is the state of cosmetic only DLC in other games (in this case, Valorant). Ridiculous, right? Still, people pay and maybe even enjoyed it. I won't be buying them, though, and I imagine you will not be buying the next stuff pack.
A lot of DLC is just cosmetic, even in the sims, chairs, tables, shelves, etc. Wish we had more interactive objects, even in stuff packs.
The similarity is part of my point.
and you think that's not a problem?
y'all are just asking ea to make even more garbage packs because y'all will pay for it and still enjoy getting scammed
To be quite frank, the more content the better. They are choices. Be it a $10 stuff pack, $20 game pack, or a $40 expansion you have the choice of whether you want it or not. The best part of having options is that if it doesn't speak to you, you do not have to have it much less pay for it. If enough people agree with you and do not support it, it will fade away. If not, people are not wrong for liking what they please and using their money accordingly.
We all want more value for our money, but like the Valorant example you can find worse out there or even rationalize paying crazy amounts. Personally? I feel comfortable spending $10 on a stuff pack I like. If EA wants to put out more, I'll certainly look at them.
