Home Decorator Game Changer Let's Play Thread

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

I did look at all of her video and she said later that she didn't know if her glitches were due to playing with the mod MCCC and others playing without it hadn't come across them. They might not have tried out what she did though so I ended up not knowing if they were bugs or not. She did explain well though and I hoped she would go a bit further than she did with walk in wardrobes etc.

I'm wondering if you could make a lot of Simoleons fast by making a whole house of 8 Adult Sims interior decorators or if that would crash the whole game! If you could, that could be a challenge for someone.

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

Doubt it. Early access was only a few days (from Thursday until now).

https://twitter.com/icemunmun/status/1399425562930663432

I love the new hairstyles.

"Onverser;c-17897113" wrote:

"Simburian;c-17897106" wrote:
Plumbella was enough for me. She's so depressing. I'll leave the others, thanks and see for myself. :(

How exactly was her video depressing.. It seemed very fair for me, she pointed out the good and bad which is what a review should be about. If you're looking for "this is wonderful everything is perfect" and no fair consideration of both sides you're probably better sticking to the "ea apologist" types and developer streams

I was actually well impressed by her honesty. i'm def not getting this pack until bugs are fixed.

"Simburian;c-17897106" wrote:
Plumbella was enough for me. She's so depressing. I'll leave the others, thanks and see for myself. :(

I watched her review, along with Grim's, and they were both more of a negative review of the pack. Grim's was straight dialogue about a gamepack having no gameplay but Plumbella really spoke about the bugs, she has proof for everything she's actually saying and it's definitely possible that she's being "depressing" because she's disappointed in this pack. It's not fun, it's buggy, and for the type of player Plumbella is, it doesn't appeal to her. She was honest in her feedback and she tried to find positives to highlight.

Constructive Criticism is healthy.

"haneul;c-17897260" wrote:

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

Doubt it. Early access was only a few days (from Thursday until now).

It could be that some were using old Saves in which they had previously used mods. Plus EnglishSimmer did say that she was using the MCCC mod whilst playing so couldn't be sure they were as others playing without it hadn't come across them themselves (yet)?

If you do use a lot it might be best to try it out first with a new Save and no mods or cc for a bit to test it if you buy it or wait a bit.

"haneul;c-17897260" wrote:

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

Doubt it. Early access was only a few days (from Thursday until now).

I think that's the biggest issue with early access and the gamechanger program as a whole, they don't have enough time to properly play things through so they have to rush out reviews before they have the time to get over the initial excitement. It leaves no room for long term opinions. Like most packs are gonna be fun on day 2, but is it still fun after a week, or two weeks? That's something very important for reviews because obviously a pack isn't that great if it's only fun for a week but because of the rush they're put under for content they don't get time to get bored and think more on it.

"Onverser;c-17897475" wrote:

"haneul;c-17897260" wrote:

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

"CK213;c-17897157" wrote:
I like how much depth English Simmer went into.
It seems like there are some bugs, I hope early access gives EA some time to at least fix any serious one.

Doubt it. Early access was only a few days (from Thursday until now).

I think that's the biggest issue with early access and the gamechanger program as a whole, they don't have enough time to properly play things through so they have to rush out reviews before they have the time to get over the initial excitement. It leaves no room for long term opinions. Like most packs are gonna be fun on day 2, but is it still fun after a week, or two weeks? That's something very important for reviews because obviously a pack isn't that great if it's only fun for a week but because of the rush they're put under for content they don't get time to get bored and think more on it.

Yep they use to give them more time. 1 day before the pack releases isn't enough time.

There's not much in the pack. I think that's why they were given only one day to review it...