Forum Discussion
7 years ago
> @Writin_Reg said:
> 5782341b77vl wrote: »
>
> This pack sounds ALMOST as bad as the (Sims3) Katy Perry Sweet Treats! Only good thing about Sweet Treats was that it was a stand alone pack!
>
> EDIT: I'm seriously considering about passing on this pack!
>
>
>
>
> Not technically on the Katy Perry Pack - it was costumes (from Katy Perry's California Girl Tour) mainly useful in the singing career of the Showtime EP. So it was technically an sp for an ep also - even though the argument can be made you did not NEED the ep to use it - I have to question that opinion seeing as regular clothes it looked ridiculous but did look good as show costumes. I owned it and the only time I used it outside of the pool lot and ice cream lot was for the shows my Katy Perry Sim put on stage in Sims 3. (Keep in mind this pack was 20 dollars).
>
> As for the small furry pets pack we just got - I like it. Helps me make a cheery looking happy place for fun families and their pets. I also could see some of the furniture as looking cute in a child/toddler related restaurant, play house, or even a nursery school... which are just ideas I have. I am particularly fond of the Pygmy Hedgehog and the Void Creature and look forward to having these additions to my game.
>
> But is it worth it: well that is question only you can decide. To me, yes.
The Katy Perry Pack (KPP) wasn't the best pack ever but, at least, it was built around a theme. KPP and Showtime were only connected the way you used it. You could use it on a spoiled kid on the base game only, on an excentric/insane sims or with regular sims in the utopian future.
And Showtime had already multiple choices for the show costume of your sims.
The sims 4 First pet stuff doesn't have a theme. If the point of this stuff pack was the rodent, it's a failure since more than half of the content is for cats&dogs or related to the sims 4 cats and dogs's theme.
> 5782341b77vl wrote: »
>
> This pack sounds ALMOST as bad as the (Sims3) Katy Perry Sweet Treats! Only good thing about Sweet Treats was that it was a stand alone pack!
>
> EDIT: I'm seriously considering about passing on this pack!
>
>
>
>
> Not technically on the Katy Perry Pack - it was costumes (from Katy Perry's California Girl Tour) mainly useful in the singing career of the Showtime EP. So it was technically an sp for an ep also - even though the argument can be made you did not NEED the ep to use it - I have to question that opinion seeing as regular clothes it looked ridiculous but did look good as show costumes. I owned it and the only time I used it outside of the pool lot and ice cream lot was for the shows my Katy Perry Sim put on stage in Sims 3. (Keep in mind this pack was 20 dollars).
>
> As for the small furry pets pack we just got - I like it. Helps me make a cheery looking happy place for fun families and their pets. I also could see some of the furniture as looking cute in a child/toddler related restaurant, play house, or even a nursery school... which are just ideas I have. I am particularly fond of the Pygmy Hedgehog and the Void Creature and look forward to having these additions to my game.
>
> But is it worth it: well that is question only you can decide. To me, yes.
The Katy Perry Pack (KPP) wasn't the best pack ever but, at least, it was built around a theme. KPP and Showtime were only connected the way you used it. You could use it on a spoiled kid on the base game only, on an excentric/insane sims or with regular sims in the utopian future.
And Showtime had already multiple choices for the show costume of your sims.
The sims 4 First pet stuff doesn't have a theme. If the point of this stuff pack was the rodent, it's a failure since more than half of the content is for cats&dogs or related to the sims 4 cats and dogs's theme.