"pepperjax1230;c-16402526" wrote:
"Lustianicia;c-16399864" wrote:
No... I didn't even buy it because I already knew from the beginning that it's not worth the price. The content in this pack should've been included in 'Cats & Dogs'. From the moment this pack was even announced, I made a promise to myself that I won't purchase it... and I kept that promise. There's honestly no need to pay an extra $10 for content that should've been included with a previously released pack.
Its a stuff pack it only 10 dollars and the SP are the sims store. You expect everything in a pack and it to fit what you want. I have no problems with SP GP Or EP and I don't sit and say they should have been included in the Cats & Dogs EP. I mean I have but I don't think that now.
It's really not about how much it is that's bothering people as much as the content in the pack and how it's just reskin/recolor or what not of the same items in C&D. That's why we feel it should have been added. I think they should have done more of a focus on the first pet concept. My first pet was actually a parakeet. If they would have focused more on that concept of bringing a first pet into the game (maybe even a game pack for it) than throwing in what looks to be items that were supposed to be included in C&D (like the clothing, pet beds and cat items for example) I don't think anyone would have had an issue with it. I know I personally would not have had an issue with that. It's really about the principle. I appreciate Graham and what he was trying to do. I really do. However there's no way I could support something like this stuff pack. It just seems like a slap to the face. and by no means do I don't blame him. He has to answer to someone else. He doesn't make these decisions by himself.