"Naus;c-16976197" wrote:
"Katlyn2525;c-16976182" wrote:
I agree. I have Sim's Medieval does have replayability. The reason it failed was really because of how it was poorly marketed. People thought it had more of a Sim's 3 vive. Some even thought it was a EP. You couldn't mod it. You couldn't build in it like you could in the sims. It was meant to be a rpg spinoff. I think there was enough quests in it that it had replay value. Its biggest issue was it was not part of the actual Sim's 3 game.
You can also complete quests with different heroes, and each hero has a different way of solving the problem. I've been playing Medieval on and off for 6 or 7 years and I still encounter new situations I haven't encountered before.
I agree. I was also disappointed at first it wasn't more like The Sims 3, but I decided to give it a chance and I started to enjoy it for what is, not what I wanted it to be. I wish they had also released an EP for The Sims 3 to travel to the past with some of the features from Medieval, except the quest and Kingdom system. Both things could've existed simultaneously and cater to different players.
It is not a bad game at all. I like it. I went in knowing what it was. But that does not mean I want this game to turn from a sandbox game. The Sim's Medieval and like games have their own place.
