You don't seem to be grasping Naus, that this isn't an "evidence and facts" debate. This is entirely down to individual perspective. This is why your graphs and math mean absolutely nothing, to the players.
You could create a flow chart on why pop punk is "objectively" better than hardcore punk, and it would also mean nothing. Because music, art, movies and games are a completely unique, and personal experience.
This is why I have so many issues with certain hardcore sims 3 stans, their narrative begins with their experience as the default, as they try to contort the pieces to fit their conclusion, all while disingenuously calling themselves "objective".
"academia wouldn't exist. What's the point of an evolutionary biologist publishing a carefully researched paper if their dissertation has the same value than a random person on the internet writing "evolution doesn't exist." You conflating biology and video games is intellectually bankrupt, and you know it. Biology is OBSERVABLE, and repeatable, researchers need peer review before any of their propositions are published; the arts (video games) are (pertaining to like/dislike) a preference that can not be quantified with the same measurements- video games/movies/art style have too many varying tastes. Academia will still exist, whether or not we agree with your bloviating, spreadsheets.
You have way too much confirmation bias, to be objective and regurgitating the word doesn't make you more credible; there is a big difference between "facts(tm)" and facts; facts speak for themselves, too many people throw around the word "fact(tm)" to support their personal arguments; all while flamebating, then to try to pass it off as "intellectual curiosity".
